§7456 — Administration of oaths and procurement of testimony

62 cases·15 followed·47 cited24% support

(a)In general

For the efficient administration of the functions vested in the Tax Court or any division thereof, any judge or special trial judge of the Tax Court, the clerk of the court or his deputies, as such, or any other employee of the Tax Court designated in writing for the purpose by the chief judge, may administer oaths, and any judge or special trial judge of the Tax Court may examine witnesses and require, by subpoena ordered by the Tax Court or any division thereof and signed by the judge or special trial judge (or by the clerk of the Tax Court or by any other employee of the Tax Court when acting as deputy clerk)—

(1)

the attendance and testimony of witnesses, and the production of all necessary returns, books, papers, documents, correspondence, and other evidence, from any place in the United States at any designated place of hearing, or

(2)

the taking of a deposition before any designated individual competent to administer oaths under this title. In the case of a deposition the testimony shall be reduced to writing by the individual taking the deposition or under his direction and shall then be subscribed by the deponent.

(b)Production of records in the case of foreign corporations, foreign trusts or estates and nonresident alien individuals

The Tax Court or any division thereof, upon motion and notice by the Secretary, and upon good cause shown therefor, shall order any foreign corporation, foreign trust or estate, or nonresident alien individual, who has filed a petition with the Tax Court, to produce, or, upon satisfactory proof to the Tax Court or any of its divisions, that the petitioner is unable to produce, to make available to the Secretary, and, in either case, to permit the inspection, copying, or photographing of, such books, records, documents, memoranda, correspondence and other papers, wherever situated, as the Tax Court or any division thereof, may deem relevant to the proceedings and which are in the possession, custody or control of the petitioner, or of any person directly or indirectly under his control or having control over him or subject to the same common control. If the petitioner fails or refuses to comply with any of the provisions of such order, after reasonable time for compliance has been afforded to him, the Tax Court or any division thereof, upon motion, shall make an order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or dismissing the proceeding or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the petitioner. For the purpose of this subsection, the term “foreign trust or estate” includes an estate or trust, any fiduciary of which is a foreign corporation or nonresident alien individual; and the term “control” is not limited to legal control.

(c)Incidental powers

The Tax Court and each division thereof shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as—

(1)

misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice;

(2)

misbehavior of any of its officers in their official transactions; or

(3)

disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command.

It shall have such assistance in the carrying out of its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command as is available to a court of the United States. The United States marshal for any district in which the Tax Court is sitting shall, when requested by the chief judge of the Tax Court, attend any session of the Tax Court in such district and may otherwise provide, when requested by the chief judge of the Tax Court, for the security of the Tax Court, including the personal protection of Tax Court judges, court officers, witnesses, and other threatened persons in the interests of justice, where criminal intimidation impedes on the functioning of the judicial process or any other official proceeding. The United States Marshals Service retains final authority regarding security requirements for the Tax Court.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.7456-1 Administration of oaths and procurement of testimony; production of records of foreign corporations, foreign trusts or estates and nonresident alien individuals

62 Citing Cases

ty under sec. 6673, I.R.C., and a sanction because of P's disobedience, avoidance, and resistance to this Court's orders, Rules, decrees, or commands. SERVED DEC 1 2 2002 - 2 - Held: R's motion will be granted. P is liable for a criminal fine under sec. 7456, I.R.C., as a sanction for his misbehavior. Jimmie L. Williams, pro se. Michael W. Berwind, for respondent. OPINION GERBER, Judge: Respondent moved to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution and for sanctions to be imposed on Jimmie L. Wil

at 614.9 In 1969 Congress also amended section 7456 to provide Tax Court Judges with the "quintessentiallyjudicial" power, Freytag v.

wing the bankruptcy cases to linger just long enough to invoke the automatic stay to delay trial in this Court. This outrageous behavior also prompted us to punish his dishonesty with an - 15 - additional $5,000 penalty for criminal contempt under section 7456. Id. at 282-83. In this case, though, we think it more appropriate to sanction Mr. Allison personally in his role as the estate’s attorney, so that any other beneficiaries of the estate don’t suffer for his actions. Section 6673(a)(2)(A) g

Williams v. Commissioner 119 T.C. 276 · 2002

Accordingly, it is appropriate to impose a criminal sanction under section 7456 for petitioner’s misbehavior under section 7456, in addition to the $25,000 penalty imposed under section 6673.

David K. Straight, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-569 · 1997

We do not know whether she knew that her initial denial that she had changed the 30-day letter was incorrect; but even if she did not know, we think she was not sufficiently mindful of her obligations to the Court and counsel in this case. The effect of her conduct was to cause petitioner to incur additional litigation expenses. As respo

Carland, Inc. v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 505 · 1988
Rybak v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 524 · 1988
Clayden v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 656 · 1988
Powell v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 673 · 1988
Kellogg v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 167 · 1987
Patin v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 1086 · 1987
Blum v. Commissioner 86 T.C. 1128 · 1986
Logan v. Commissioner 86 T.C. 1222 · 1986
Olson v. Commissioner 86 T.C. 1314 · 1986
Craigie, Inc. v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 466 · 1985
Rust v. Commissioner 85 T.C. 284 · 1985
Barbados #6 Ltd. v. Commissioner 85 T.C. 900 · 1985
Ryan v. Commissioner 67 T.C. 212 · 1976
Davis v. Commissioner 115 T.C. 35 · 2000
Fry v. Commissioner 92 T.C. 368 · 1989
Masek v. Commissioner 92 T.C. 814 · 1989
Estate of Egger v. Commissioner 92 T.C. 1079 · 1989
Calcutt v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 14 · 1988
Woods v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 88 · 1988
Godlewski v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 200 · 1988
Berkery v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 259 · 1988
Estate of Haber v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 236 · 1988
Bailey v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 558 · 1988
Loftus v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 845 · 1988
Bell v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 878 · 1988
Masek v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 1096 · 1988
Givens v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 1145 · 1988
Loda Poultry Co. v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 816 · 1987
Fogg v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 310 · 1987
Rivera v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 343 · 1987
Burwell v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 580 · 1987
Kallich v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 676 · 1987
Estate of Egger v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 726 · 1987
Hubbard v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 792 · 1987
Yusko v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 806 · 1987
Freytag v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 849 · 1987
Zirker v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 970 · 1986
Murphree v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 1309 · 1986
Michaels v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 1412 · 1986
Storelli v. Commissioner 86 T.C. 443 · 1986
Herman v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 120 · 1985
Derksen v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 355 · 1985
Eanes v. Commissioner 85 T.C. 168 · 1985
Taub v. Commissioner 64 T.C. 741 · 1975
Hartman v. Commissioner 65 T.C. 542 · 1975
Estate of Nail v. Commissioner 59 T.C. 187 · 1972