§7463(b) — Finality of decisions

1566 cases·1359 followed·1 distinguished·2 overruled·204 cited87% support

(b)Finality of decisions

A decision entered in any case in which the proceedings are conducted under this section shall not be reviewed in any other court and shall not be treated as a precedent for any other case.

1566 Citing Cases

6015(e)(1)(A), Butler was overruled by Porter v.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED John Henry Besaw, Petitioner · 2025

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Linsey Goodale, Petitioner · 2025

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED DCSL, LLC, Petitioner · 2025

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED John Henry Besaw, Petitioner · 2025

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION URDA, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Maureen F. Shoe, Petitioner · 2024

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Rosa M. Marcano, Petitioner · 2024

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Ruby Tang, Petitioner · 2024

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Yelena Tolstov, Petitioner · 2024

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other Court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Lonnie Wayne Hubbard, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2024-16 · 2024

The Court agreed with the 3 Section 7463(b) provides that in the case of disputes involving $50,000 or less that are described in section 7463(a) (i.e.

FOLLOWED Mark F. Coble, Petitioner · 2024

SUMMARY OPINION GREAVES, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Oleg Kolomiyets, Petitioner · 2024

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION MARSHALL, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION HALPERN, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Donald S. Ahaiwe, Petitioner · 2023

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CHOI, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was submitted pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CHOI, Special Trial Judge: This case was submitted pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GREAVES, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LANDY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Sean Paul Polete, Petitioner · 2023

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Mark P. Hafner, Petitioner · 2023

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LANDY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Nuntiya Sripa, Petitioner · 2023

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PARIS, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PARIS, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Donald S. Tracy, Petitioner · 2023

SUMMARY OPINION CHOI, Special Trial Judge: This case was brought pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b),1 the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was submitted pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Francis Kemegue, Petitioner · 2023

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Maribel Gonzalez, Petitioner · 2022

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION COPELAND, Judge: This case was submitted pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Nicole Harrison, Petitioner · 2022

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION NEGA, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION PARIS, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED George C. Luna, Petitioner · 2022

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION COPELAND, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This collection review case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION WELLS, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION MARSHALL, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION WELLS, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jihad Y. Ibrahim, Petitioner · 2022

SUMMARY OPINION WEILER, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Cheri L. Rau, Petitioner · 2022

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case for the redetermination of a deficiency was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION WEILER, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) Served 07/19/21 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) Served 08/23/21 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Served 08/31/21 - 2 - SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Served 08/17/21 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GREAVES, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect when the petition was Served 09/13/21 - 2 - filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

All dollar amounts are rounded to the (continued...) Served 08/11/21 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED John Legoski, Petitioner · 2021

SUMMARY OPINION PUGH, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This collection review case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) Served 04/14/21 -2- reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Nowran Gopi, Petitioner · 2021

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect when the Served 12/02/21 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) Served 07/19/21 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Donald G. Swyers, Petitioner · 2021

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended, in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition Served 08/17/21 - 2 - was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Served 01/26/21 - 2 - SUMMARY OPINION1 GREAVES, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect when the petition was filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest (continued...) Served 05/17/21 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Avito M. Vasquez, Petitioner · 2021

s heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Served 09/13/21 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Served 07/08/21 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This deficiency case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Served 05/10/21 -2- petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was Served 11/16/21 - 2 - filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition Served 08/16/21 - 2 - was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Served 05/19/21 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Leila Saedian, Petitioner · 2021

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) Served 07/29/21 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Angela West, Petitioner · 2021

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Served 07/26/21 - 2 - opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Served 05/19/21 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Alan Dexter Wenk, Petitioner · 2021

to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) Served 02/10/21 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION NEGA, Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Served 10/06/21 - 2 - petitions were filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Travis Bridges, Petitioner · 2021

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) Served 06/29/21 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Served 09/23/21 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION NEGA, Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Served 10/06/21 - 2 - petitions were filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Served 01/25/21 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) Served 03/08/21 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) Served 05/12/21 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Served 08/16/21 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended, in effect for the years in issue, and Rule references are (continued...) Served 07/01/21 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall n

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) Served 01/21/21 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Mar 11 2020 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Darline Francois, Petitioner · 2020

SERVED Jun 30 2020 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Apr 20 2020 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Jan 06 2020 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Sep 17 2020 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Judy Yiu, Petitioner · 2020

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Aug 05 2020 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Aug 18 2020 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Nov 09 2020 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Feb 18 2020 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Jun 16 2020 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in (continued...) SERVED Aug 03 2020 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Petitioner resided in (continued...) SERVED Jan 07 2020 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Enrique Aguilar, Petitioner · 2020

SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED May 26 2020 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GOEKE, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Feb 10 2020 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Suresh Anisetti, Petitioner · 2020

We (continued...) SERVED Jan 14 2020 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Apr 09 2020 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED Aug 27 2020 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Jan 15 2020 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: This case was heard subject to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Jan 30 2020 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jemar Y. Purdie, Petitioner · 2020

SERVED Jan 21 2020 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Friday O. James, Petitioner · 2020

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This collection review case involving a Federal tax lien was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as (continued...) SERVED Feb 27 2020 - 2 - the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Mark Pilyavsky, Petitioner · 2020

ant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the relevant times, and all Rule references are to the (continued...) SERVED Jul 02 2020 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Jul 22 2020 - 2 - petition was filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Jan 16 2020 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Mr.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, in (continued...) SERVED Oct 01 2019 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jennifer Esteen, Petitioner · 2019

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Jul 02 2019 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

o the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹ All other section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the year in issue, and all Rules references are to the Tax Court Rules of (continued...) SERVED Sep 30 2019 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION VASQUEZ, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹All section references are to the Code in effect for the year in issue, and all (continued...) SERVED Jul 01 2019 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED James M. Cambria, Petitioner · 2019

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Joel H. Arseo, Petitioner · 2019

SERVED May 02 2019 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Teresa G. Murphy, Petitioner · 2019

SUMMARY OPINION NEGA, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Intemal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Oct 15 2019 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Apr 04 2019 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Diana Doucoure, Petitioner · 2019

SERVED Aug 12 2019 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Mar 05 2019 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Aug 05 2019 -2- reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Dwayne Perry, Petitioner · 2019

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for the relevant period.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for 2015.

FOLLOWED Diana Doucoure, Petitioner · 2019

SERVED Aug 12 2019 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Jul 15 2019 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to (continued...) SERVED Mar 04 2019 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be tr

We (continued...) SERVED Dec 03 2019 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED May 02 2019 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Brent Katusha, Petitioner · 2019

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Oct 10 2019 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

dollars unless (continued...) SERVED Sep 23 2019 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Sep 30 2019 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jun Wu, Petitioner · 2019

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Jul 25 2019 - 2 - not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Nov 04 2019 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Some monetary amounts are rounded (continued...) SERVED Jan 29 2019 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other Court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for 2013.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED Sep 04 2019 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not b

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, in (continued...) SERVED Apr 02 2019 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for 2013, and all Rule references (continued...) SERVED Jun 24 2019 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Aug 08 2019 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C., "the Code") as amended and in effect for the relevant years, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and (continued...) SERVED Mar 18 2019 - 2 - the decision to be entere

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Jul 10 2019 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Aug 20 2019 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Aug 26 2019 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Aug 27 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended, in effect for the years in issue, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

FOLLOWED Allen A. Vest, Petitioner · 2018

SERVED Apr 04 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED May 30 2018 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

All monetary (continued...) SERVED Nov 01 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Mar 08 2018 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Salina Jivani, Petitioner · 2018

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, in (continued...) SERVED Apr 05 2018 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jin Man Park, Petitioner · 2018

SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

FOLLOWED Eric Amaefuna, Petitioner · 2018

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Jul 09 2018 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Mar 06 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Joseph Engesser, Petitioner · 2018

SUMMARY OPINION COLVIN, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED Jun 04 2018 - 2 - filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Teresa J. Henley, Petitioner · 2018

SERVED Apr 16 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Abdeia Hassan, Petitioner · 2018

SERVED Dec 06 2018 -2- petitions were filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Andy Akay, Petitioner · 2018

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1986 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Dec 03 2018 - 2 - entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Jun 06 2018 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Evgeny Kiselev, Petitioner · 2018

SERVED Jan 10 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED May 14 2018 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Apr 03 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED Apr 18 2018 -2- filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Jan 31 2018 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED Oct 04 2018 -2- filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Dec 06 2018 -2- petitions were filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jason J. Gartlan, Petitioner · 2018

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect for the taxable year 2015, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED Jun 06 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Apr 05 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Apr 09 2018 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Chevy Frankel, Petitioner · 2018

SERVED Sep 19 2018 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Dec 03 2018 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Mar 20 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Kelly Chafin Lim, Petitioner · 2018

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Dec 26 2018 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Feb 05 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED May 24 2018 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Abdeia Hassan, Petitioner · 2018

SERVED Dec 06 2018 -2- petitions were filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Adam D. Fehr, Petitioner · 2018

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED May 16 2018 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Jul 02 2018 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Mar 06 2018 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Corey V. Triggs, Petitioner · 2018

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Dec 26 2018 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Nov 08 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION RUWE, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Intemal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Apr 16 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Monetary amounts are rounded to the (continued...) SERVED Aug 07 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED Sep 17 2018 -2- filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Jun 27 2018 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Toni Harris, Petitioner · 2018

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Mar 13 2018 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Nov 05 2018 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Apr 04 2018 -2- reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Sep 17 2018 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Sep 05 2018 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Some monetary amounts are rounded (continued...) SERVED Nov 27 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other Court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Jul 12 2018 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Dec 06 2018 -2- petitions were filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Mar 19 2018 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION RUWE, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Intemal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Aug 13 2018 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Jul 12 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Jul 31 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Mar 13 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jason M. Roach, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Apr 27 2017 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Kelly Butler, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as (continued...) SERVED Nov 09 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Mar 08 2017 2 reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Mary A. Colliver, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Dec 26 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Jun 28 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Paul Chen, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Dec 13 2017 -2- reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Steve Pemberton, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Dec 18 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Apr 03 2017 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Kent E. Keeter, Petitioner · 2017

t to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED May 30 2017 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Pardeep Singh, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Mar 23 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and (continued...) SERVED Apr 25 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Gary Lee McIntee, Petitioner · 2017

SERVED Jul 11 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PUGH, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Jun 29 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Mark A. Quintal, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Feb 02 2017 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED J. Drew Koester, Petitioner · 2017

SERVED Dec 04 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Feb 06 2017 2 petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for the years in issue.

SUMMARY OPINION VASQUEZ, Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Nov 09 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Jul 12 2017 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Edward Collins, Petitioner · 2017

SERVED Sep 11 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED May 11 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Ann Zollinger, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Nov 09 2017 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered in this case is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Eric Zudak, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Jun 19 2017 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

¹All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and (continued...) SERVED Mar 06 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Randall L. Grago, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Aug 24 2017 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Eric Alan Harris, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Oct 03 2017 -2- reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Apr 27 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Feb 08 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Dec 26 2017 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

t to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to (continued...) SERVED Oct 25 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Feb 13 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Jul 20 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Alfred H. Shum, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times.

FOLLOWED Raymond Ochoa, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Oct 04 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Gregory J. Gowen, Petitioner · 2017

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Matthew Bell, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Aug 16 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Dec 18 2017 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED Oct 02 2017 - 2 - filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Aug 17 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED David L. Jones, Petitioner · 2017

SERVED Sep 13 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the (continued...) SERVED Apr 27 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Aug 10 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

After the parties' concessions, we hold that petitioners are entitled to deduct an additional $2,800 for 2012 (over the $2,200 respondent allowed during audit) and to amortize $362.93 over 180 months beginning with December 2012; (3) whether petitioners are entitled to itemized deductions claimed on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, for u

nt to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED Jul 24 2017 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Dec 27 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Aug 09 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Trudy S. Reed, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED May 08 2017 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

o the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to (continued...) SERVED Nov 09 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Ivan Levine, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Aug 07 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Intemal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Jun 26 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Jan 30 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED May 08 2017 2 reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Rita Lopez, Petitioner · 2017

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the years in issue.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED May 08 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Alan David Snow, Petitioner · 2017

SERVED Jun 12 2017 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Jul 17 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Jun 28 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION VASQUEZ, Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Nov 09 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Jul 13 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Jul 20 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Windy W. Harris, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Mar 30 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended and in effect for the taxable year 2012, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

FOLLOWED Mark S. Siegel, Petitioner · 2017

SERVED Jul 17 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Dec 04 2017 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Jun 28 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect for the taxable year 2012, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1986 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Aug 17 2017 - 2 - not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and (continued...) SERVED May 25 2017 -2- reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treate

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for the years in issue.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Nov 01 2017 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Aug 29 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Paul Niski, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED May 23 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the year in issue.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Aug 29 2017 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED May 24 2017 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Wilfred Omoloh, Petitioner · 2017

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Aug 16 2017 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

All monetary amounts are (continued...) SERVED Mar 13 2017 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion may not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Nov 09 2016 - 2 - the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered in this case is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Sep 26 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Tao Long, Petitioner · 2016

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Dec 20 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Apr 04 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Julie Tishkoff, Petitioner · 2016

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Oct 06 2016 2 reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Kevin A. Peck, Petitioner · 2016

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect at all relevant times.

FOLLOWED Victor M. Crown, Petitioner · 2016

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect at all relevant times.

FOLLOWED Warren Satchell, Petitioner · 2016

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered in this case is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Daniel L. Cook, Petitioner · 2016

t to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED Aug 02 2016 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: Each ofthese consolidated cases was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Intemal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

SUMMARY OPINION LEYDEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the (continued...) SERVED Aug 24 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Sep 01 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered in not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Julie A. Tizard, Petitioner · 2016

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Aug 15 2016 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Oct 17 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Elazar M. Cole, Petitioner · 2016

to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED May 16 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other Court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION RUWE, Judge: The petition in this case was filed pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the ¹All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for 2011.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not ¹These cases were consolidated for purposes oftrial, briefing, and opinion.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not ¹These cases were consolidated for purposes oftrial, briefing, and opinion.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Aug 08 2016 2 reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Diran Li, Petitioner · 2016

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect for the taxable year 2012.

FOLLOWED George Tzivleris, Petitioner · 2016

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Jun 20 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Nov 08 2016 2 reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

ant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years under consideration, and all Rule references (continued...) SERVED Apr 25 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

We round all monetary amounts (continued...) SERVED Nov 15 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Jun 20 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Ruben Jauregui, Petitioner · 2016

SERVED Aug 08 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Dec 13 2016 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Paul Parisi, Petitioner · 2016

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Sep 29 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Mar 08 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Nov 08 2016 2 reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Sofien Beltifa, Petitioner · 2016

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Intemal (continued...) SERVED Jun 23 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PUGH, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Jan 11 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references, as well as all (continued...) SERVED May 12 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Nov 03 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Nov 03 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of (continued...) SERVED Sep 26 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Gregor MacInnis, Petitioner · 2016

nt to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED Nov 16 2016 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ASHFORD, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Intemal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Intemal (continued...) SERVED May 12 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other Court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this ¹All subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, 2012.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Intemal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the years in issue.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Jun 22 2016 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Djamal Mameri, Petitioner · 2016

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Aug 24 2016 2 reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for 2010.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Aug 08 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to ¹By order dated August 5, 2015, these cases were consolidated.

2Hereinafter, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in (continued...) SERVED Aug 25 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ASHFORD, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED Aug 17 2016 - 2 - filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other Court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Amanda N. Vu, Petitioner · 2016

SERVED Nov 08 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other Court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED May 26 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Joseph L. Evans, Petitioner · 2016

SERVED Jul 05 2016 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to ¹By order dated August 5, 2015, these cases were consolidated.

FOLLOWED Xionghui He, Petitioner · 2016

SERVED Jan 28 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Lawrence L. Cole, Petitioner · 2016

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Sep 27 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jose G. Henao, Petitioner · 2016

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Dec 21 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Sep 15 2016 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Daniel Binns, Petitioner · 2016

SUMMARY OPINION WHERRY, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the year in issue, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Oct 24 2016 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Christian Sioui, Petitioner · 2016

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Dec 19 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: Each ofthese consolidated cases was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Intemal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Jan 28 2016 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Aug 02 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Aug 15 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Mar 09 2016 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Apr 14 2016 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

We hold that she is.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect at all relevant times.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Leticia Saenz, Petitioner · 2015

SERVED FEB - 3 20f5 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED APR 2 0 2015 - 2 - for any other case.

SERVED Nov 24 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 'Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SEftVED AUG 1 7 2015 2 reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED APR - 6 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any SERVED Oct 22 2015 -2- other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SEWED APR 2 0 2015 -2- filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any othercourt, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED JUN 2 92015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for 2010.

FOLLOWED Roberta Lee Howe, Petitioner · 2015

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED AUG - 3 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Dec 21 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Nov 19 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION BUCH, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

Some monetary amounts are (continued...) SBWED JUN - 1 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), IUnless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED AUG - 6 2015 - 2 - the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Ruth A. Lobs, Petitioner · 2015

We hold that she did.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED 11AY 1 1 2015 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2010, the taxable year in issue.

SERVED Dec 02 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Maria Sanchez, Petitioner · 2015

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

SERVED FEB - 2 2015 - 2 - SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Darrel W. Wyatt, Petitioner · 2015

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED APR 20 2015 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Nov 09 2015 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED MAY 1 4 2015 t - 2 - filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Oct 05 2015 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Oct 01 2015 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SEfWED APR 2 1 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jamshed Chaudry, Petitioner · 2015

SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Dec 21 2015 - 2 - petitions were filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION THORNTON, ChiefJudge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED AUG 2 5 2015 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of (continued...) SERVED FEB - 5 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effectwhen the SERVED FEB 2 3 2015 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED APR 13 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Priscilla J. Lee, Petitioner · 2015

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other Court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Dec 21 2015 - 2 - petitions were filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Linda S. Spjute, Petitioner · 2015

SERVED Sep 21 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Adiatu M. Jalloh, Petitioner · 2015

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effectwhen the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended, in effect for the years in issue, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Nov 09 2015 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

2Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Dec 10 2015 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Reinaldo Vargas, Petitioner · 2015

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Nov 30 2015 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Joshua W. Pingel, Petitioner · 2015

SEVED AUG 1 0 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Preston L. Kott, Petitioner · 2015

SERVED JUL 1 4 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED MAR 1 7 2015 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Oct 15 2015 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Carlos Calderon, Petitioner · 2015

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the years in issue.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by SERVED FEB - 3 2015 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Myriam L. Cadet, Petitioner · 2015

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect for 2012, and Rule references are to the Tax Court (continued...) SERVED JUL - 6 2015 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treat

We hold that she did not.

SERVED JUL 1 4 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION NEGA, Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Mar 25 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION THORNTON, ChiefJudge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹All other section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times.

FOLLOWED Kurt H. Haben, Petitioner · 2015

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED SEP - 8 2015 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effectwhen the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED MAR 3 7 2015 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Dale Martin Sana, Petitioner · 2015

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Dec 02 2015 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Qui Van Phan, Petitioner · 2015

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SEVED FEB 1 1 2015 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED FEB 2 4 2015 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED AUG 2 4 2015 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for.any other case.

2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Frank Baker, Petitioner · 2014

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED JUN 2 3 2014 -2- filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED FEB 25 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b),' the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Joel G. Nganga, Petitioner · 2014

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED JUN - 4-2014 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED MAR 2T 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED MAR 1 0 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jason Alan Bruce, Petitioner · 2014

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SEfWED MAY 1 2 2014 - 2 - for any other case.

FOLLOWED Allan L. Blank, Petitioner · 2014

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not .

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED DEC 2 22014 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED AUG 1 3 2014 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

2Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED NOV 10 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Jul 28 2014 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended and in effect for 2009, and Rule references are to the (continued...) SERVED FEB 0 3 2014 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treate

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED JUN 1 1 2014 - 2 - the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED AUG 2 8 2014 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Derek W. Somogyi, Petitioner · 2014

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED NOV 1 0 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

2Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED NOV 10 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

2Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED NOV 10 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effectwhen the SERVED FEB 1 9 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED Jun 16 2014 - 2 - for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SS JAN 1 5 2014 - 2 - for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED JAN - 6 2014 - 2 - .

to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED JUL 1 0 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED JUN 2 4 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED JAN 1 5 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Tony Ray Duncan, Petitioner · 2014

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special 'Irial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Jun 19 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

We hold that they are.

¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the (continued...) SERVED FEB 2 4 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Douglas Zierdt, Petitioner · 2014

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effectwhen the petitions were filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are ¹These cases were consolidated for purposes oftrial, briefing, and opinion.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treatyd as precedent SERVED MAR 2 7 2014 - 2 - for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered in this case is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Martin Gutierrez, Petitioner · 2014

SERVED JUL 1 6 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be ¹ Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time that the petition was filed, and all Rule (continued...) SWF0 MAY 1 2 20f4 - 2 - entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as pr

Pursuant to section 7463(b), 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as in effect for the year in issue (codified in 26 U.S.C., and referred to herein as "the Code"), and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SEflVED SEP - 3 2014 -2- petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED DEC 2 3 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Mark Pelot, Petitioner · 2014

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judae: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED MAR 1 1 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Jul 28 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Douglas Zierdt, Petitioner · 2014

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effectwhen the petitions were filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are ¹These cases were consolidated for purposes oftrial, briefing, and opinion.

FOLLOWED Susan Corso, Petitioner · 2014

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED JUL 3 6 20% - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effectwhen the SERVED JUN 2 4 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable bh any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other càse.

SUMMARY OPINION THORNTON, ChiefJudge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the (continued...) SERVED FEB 1 1 2014 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED APR 2 2 2014 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED NOV - 6 2014 -2- petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 in effectwhen the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED SEP 2 4 2014 -2- the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 746 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the year in issue.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effectwhen the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

FOLLOWED Phyllis Shaw, Petitioner · 2014

SUMMARY OPINION THORNTON, ChiefJudge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effectwhen the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and (continued...) SERVED Apr 16 2014 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treat

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED FEB 1 9 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Amy L. Harloff, Petitioner · 2014

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SWED MAR - 6 2014 6 - 2 - for any other case.

We round all dollar (continued...) SERVED Apr 17 2014 2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED JAN - 9 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Alex Halo, Petitioner · 2014

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Frank Gibson, Petitioner · 2014

SUMMARY OPINION LAUBER, J_udge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to 1All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED AUG 1 1 2014 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Maryanne Oxford, Petitioner · 2014

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effectwhen the SERVED Aug 25 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for 2010.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is notreviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED SEP 2 3 2014 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is notreviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this SERVED FEB 1 9 2014 - 2 - opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

YBfWED MAR 2 5 200 - 2 - effect when the petitions were filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jose A. Alonso, Petitioner · 2013

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED DEC - 5 2013 - 2 - for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED DEC - 9 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended (continued...) SERVED OCT 2 3 2013 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED APR 29 2013 - 2 - filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVEDMay212013 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Paul Roger Tsai, Petitioner · 2013

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED MAR 2 8 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

(continued...) - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Sherry Hudzik, Petitioner · 2013

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, andthis opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED Jan 17 2013 - 2 - for any other case.

the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to (continued...) SERVED JAN - 2 2013 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Larry Hall, Petitioner · 2013

We hold that he is not; (2) whether petitioner is entitled to the child tax credit in respect ofN.H.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVEb FEB 20 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

MfED JUN 1 0 2013 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated SERVED JUL - 3 2013 - 2 - as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED NOV - 4 2013 - 2 - for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED Sep 26 2013 - 2 - filed.) Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED AUG 1 3 2013 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED JAN 3 0 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the D îlR1 3 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.i Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED MAR 1 9 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED DEC 172013 - 2 - filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED Nov - 4 2013 - 2 - for any other case.

FOLLOWED Dee W. Stotts, Petitioner · 2013

05RVED QUN- 1 0 20u - 2 - petition was filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED Apr 17 2013 - 2 - for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the AVED [dAN 7 200 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Martin Toombs, Petitioner · 2013

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED JUN 25 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated SERVED JUL - 3 2013 - 2 - as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED Apr 16 2013 - 2 - filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule (continued...) SERVED Mar 04 2013 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not i Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED Sep 26 2013 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jane E. Zdunek, Petitioner · 2013

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED FEB 20 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED AUG 1 2 2013 - 2 - filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, SERVED May 20 2013 - 2 - and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Dee W. Stotts, Petitioner · 2013

05RVED QUN- 1 0 20u - 2 - petition was filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to,the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), lAll section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SiiRVED AUG 1 5 2013 - 2 - filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any öther case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED DEC -9 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jerry L. Lamb, Petitioner · 2013

to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED SEP - 5 2013 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Sal A. Westrich, Petitioner · 2013

SUMMARY OPINION VASQUEZ, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect when the petition was SERVED MAY - 7 2013 - 2 - filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED NOV 2 0 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED APR 2 2 2013 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other pourt, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

YBfWED MAR 2 5 200 - 2 - effect when the petitions were filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SiiRVED JUL 1 5 2013 - 2 - filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMAI Y ÓPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVÉD JUN 3 2013 -2- petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision o be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be tr ated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be ntered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Everardo Garcia, Petitioner · 2013

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED APR - 3 2013 - 2 - for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) eæE; NOV 2 6 2013 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Ann Marie Adams, Petitioner · 2013

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED JUL 1 8 2013 - 2 - for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED NOV 1 4 2013 -2- for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED Apr 08 2013 - 2 - filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED NOV _ 6 2013 - 2 - for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the S§RVED OCT 2 1 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED JUN 2 4 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED AUG 1 3 2013 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ISection references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended, (continued...) SERVED Jun 18 2013 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Gary P. Herring, Petitioner · 2013

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the year at issue.

!; ggBVED MAY 2 9 2013 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

YBfWED MAR 2 5 200 - 2 - effect when the petitions were filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Feb 07 2013 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION LAUBER, Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to 1All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for the tax years at issue.

S ARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect véhen the pERVED DEC 112013 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other SERVED JUL - 3 2013 - 2 - case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Ínternal Revenne Code in effect when the petition was SERVED MAY 2 8 2013 -2 - filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

e was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Joyce Coultman, Petitioner · 2013

SUMMARY OPINION VASQUEZ, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect when the petition was SERVED MAY .- 9 2013 - 2 - filed.i Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED DEC - 2 2013 - 2 - petition was filed.i Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Margaret Payne, Petitioner · 2013

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as SERVED AUG 1 3 20I1 - 2 - precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Carl Raisig, Petitioner · 2013

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: The petition in this case was filed pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) ~ SERVED JUL 1120D - 2 - entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Donald R. Leak, Petitioner · 2012

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be.entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall notbe treated as.precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVEDOct162012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SMED AUG 2 3 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, andthis opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

nt to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended and in effect for the taxable year at issue, and (continued...) SERVED NOV ' 1 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED MAR 2 7 2012 - 2 - SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judae: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jeremy L. Wade, Petitioner · 2012

-2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

We hold that he is not.

SERVED Dec 26 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

RVEB JAN 26 2012 - 2 - SUMMARY OPINION DAWSON, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.i Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

OBlWEB QUL 1 6 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Andrea Ready, Petitioner · 2012

SERVED FEB - 1 2012 -2- SUMMARY OPINION LARO, Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Eugene Koprowski, Petitioner 138 T.C. No. 5 · 2012

Under Rule 174(b), "T als ofsmall tax cases will be conducted as informally as possible consistent with rderly procedure, and any evidence deemed by the Court to have probative v lue shall be admissible." Section 7463(b) provides as follo s: SEC.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this op nion shall not be treated as precedent - 2 - for any other case.

FOLLOWED Eli D. Kohn, Petitioner · 2012

suantto the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effectwhen the petition was filed.1 1Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for the taxable year at (continued...) SERVED JEP 4 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARYOPINION ARMEN, Special'Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED .8EPm 5 2012 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED FEB 29 2012 - 2 - SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Jul 09 2012 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

$|BWED QUL 9 200 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: Each ofthese consolidated cases was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the IUnless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Sep 17 2012 -2- decision to be entered in each case is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARYOPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Interna} Revenue Code in effect when the - 2 - petition was filed.i Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED FEB 2 8 2012 - 2 - SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

GALE, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for ahy other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Scott V. White, Petitioner · 2012

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Neal C. Evans, Petitioner · 2012

SERVED DEC 26 2012 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not renewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED MAR 2 1 2012 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be 1Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Oct 10 2012 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

We hold that they are not.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the EVED - - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect when petitioner filed her petition or incurred her administrative and litigation costs, as appropriate, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

' SERWD EB 27 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Ruth Real, Petitioner · 2012

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This casé was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 'Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the (continued...) SERVED OCT 2 5 2012 -2- reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

$ERVED MAY -8 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.y The instant case is before the Court on respondent's motion for summaryjudgment pursuantto Rule 121.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not SERVED Sgp 3 3797 - 2 - reviewable by any otl er court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this op nion shall not be treated as precedent - 2 - for any other case.

SERVED t%Y -2 2012 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED JUN 2 6 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Antonio Puerta, Petitioner · 2012

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heardpursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: Each ofthese consolidated cases was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the IUnless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Sep 17 2012 -2- decision to be entered in each case is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Richard Garcia, Petitioner · 2012

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the NavED OCT 3 1 2012 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED HAY 21 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINIÓN COHEN, Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ófsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any o her court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case vias heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be 'Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the EYED ÜÜL 1 7 2012 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Tao Xu, Petitioner · 2012

I SERVED AN 3 1 2012 -2- SUMMARYOPINION DAWSON, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other SERVED JUN 2 6 2012 case.

SUMMARY OPINION SWIFT, Judae: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect whenthe petition was filed.1 IUnless otherwise noted, all section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED DEC (cid:0)57626012 -2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisionto be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED AUG -9 2012 for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Stan B. Vaughan, Petitioner · 2012

SERVED Jun 13 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION SWIFT, Judae: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 1Unless otherwise indicated,iall section references are to the Intefnal (continued...) SERVED DEC 2 6 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Thomas Tran, Petitioner · 2012

SERVED Nov 06 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

$ERVED DEC 10 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Saavao 3AR e 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b),1 the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Kathleen Murray, Petitioner · 2012

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsectiois 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be 1Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Nov 13 2012 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Margarette Nau, Petitioner · 2012

SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED OCT 3 T 202 - 2 - petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisionto be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Cöde in effect for 2007, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractiÖe and Procedure, (continued...) SERVED MK 7 2012 -2- Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, in effect for the relevant period, and all Rule (continued...) SERVED Apr 19 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

We hold they are not; and (2) whether the settlement officer (SO) abused her discretion in rejecting petitioners' proposed collection alternatives and sustaining the proposed collection action.

IUnless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at isstie, and all Rule references are to the (continued...) SERVED Sep 25 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: Each ofthese consolidated cases was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the IUnless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Sep 17 2012 -2- decision to be entered in each case is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED JAN 25 2012 - 2 - SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SEaVED AUG -8 2012 - 2 - petition was filed.i Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

1|pgED JUN 2 6 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Donna I. Colca, Petitioner · 2012

BERVED AUG - 6 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition SERVED Mar 12 2012 was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED JUN 25 2012 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by~any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED James E. Butler, Jr. & Susan C. Butler, Petitioners T.C. Memo. 2012-72 · 2012

We hold he is not; (2) whether petitioner is entitled to a $2,000 child tax credit for the two children.

LARO, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision Subsequent section references are.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Roger K. Ciafre, Petitioner · 2011

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

HAINES, Judge: This dase was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time that the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

FOLLOWED Russell T. Handy, Petitioner · 2011

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, ·l and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Alice Schneider, Petitioner · 2011

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entened is no't reviewable by any other court, and this opinion sha 1 not be treáted as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Harolyn Tarr, Petitioner · 2011

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitionswas ,filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by IUnless otherwise indicated all section- re'ferencei are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue.

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time that the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

FOLLOWED Farrokh & Marianne B. Peimani, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-102 · 2011

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue.

MEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any Unless ot herwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year :Ln lSSue .

VASQUEZ, Judge:' This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

LARO, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision Subsequent section references are to the applicable versions of the Internal Revenue Code.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

WELLS, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Rule references (continued.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2007, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Feldhammer, for respondentv HAINES, Judge : This case was heard pursuá.nt to section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect for the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Laura E. Mercado, Petitioner · 2011

GERBER, Judge: This case as heard pursuant to the provisions of sec ion 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other coùrt, and Unless othei-wise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as currently in effect, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Longy O. Anyanwu, Petitioner · 2011

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.1 IUnless otherwise indicated, all further references in this opinion to sections are to the Internal Revenue Code as in effect for the tax year 2005, and all Rule

SWIFT, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2008.

FOLLOWED David H. Pushman, Petitioner · 2011

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, IUnless otherwise noted, citations herein of sections refer to the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C ), and citations of Rules refer to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended and in effect for the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

HAINES, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

HAINES, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this.opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Edward K. & Jeri L. Glover, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-109 · 2011

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by.any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Thelma Ruffin, Petitioner · 2011

GUSTAFSON, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of - sectio(1 74631 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be· eutered i not reviewable by any other court, 1Unless otherwise noted, citations herein of sections refer to the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

WELLS, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not.

FOLLOWED John Alridge, Petitioner · 2011

CHIECHI, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provi- sions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the deci- sion to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and thise opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Eric Lynn Tracy, Petitioner · 2011

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be ent.ered is not reviewable by any other court and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Lori Menefee, Petitioner · 2011

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by -any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Johna Maudi, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-57 · 2011

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

DAWSON, Judge: The petition' in this case was filed pursuant to the provisions of section 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b),.

This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedënt for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jeffrey Gunn, Petitioner · 2011

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered ib not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not b treated as precedent for 'any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to Unless otherwise indicated,.all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended.

FOLLOWED F. Jeffrey Rahall, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-101 · 2011

GERBER, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2001 and 2002, the taxable years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

FOLLOWED Thomas H. & Janice J. Scroggins, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-103 · 2011

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

FOLLOWED Patricia Louise Hyde, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-104 · 2011

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

FOLLOWED Mark E. Warmoth, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-105 · 2011

SERVED AUG 2 9 2011 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUPPLEMENTAL SUMMARY OPINION PANUTHOS, ChiefSpecial Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the BERED OCT - 2 2012 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

HAINES, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provision of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended and in effect for the year in issue .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

GOEKE, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of secti n 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition wiIgs filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d .'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of thelInternal Revenue Code in effect'when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered-is' not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue'Code in effect for the year in issue .

was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewabl-e by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, .all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code-in effect for 2005, the taxable year in .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision t o 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as preceden t SERVED Aug 23 2010 2 - for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .l Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the de:cision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated.

CHIECHI, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provi- sions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the deci- sion to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision .

FOLLOWED Mary A. Scott, Petitioner · 2010

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

HAINES, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 74631of the{Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the .decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 'Unless otherwise indicated,' section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended .

FOLLOWED Allan L. Blank, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be(cid:127)entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

CHIECHI, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provi- sions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the'petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the deci- sion to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Barry Mamoudou, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Colleen A. Lynch, Petitioner · 2010

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code'in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 'Unless otherwise indicated, all .section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2006, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to-the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Alina Olivera, Petitioner · 2010

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986., as-amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Joe Stewart, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Sharon K. Bell, Petitioner · 2010

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b) , .the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules'of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for .

FOLLOWED Donald Brown, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not .reviewable by any other .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered i not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Issa K. Shokeh, Petitioner · 2010

LARO, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for-any other case .

DAWSON, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition, was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered-is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Lyle D. Guldager, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated.

FOLLOWED Norman J. Kelley, Petitioner · 2010

WHERRY, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenu e Code in effect when the petition .was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 198;6, as amended and in effect for the tax year at issue .

section 7463 of the Internal .Fevenue Code in effectwhen_the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), .the decision to be entered is not reviewable b y .'Unless otherwise indicated,-all-section references are to the internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Genise A. Conner, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to .be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

MORRISON, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the .decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision 'Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and Rule referencesI are to the Tax Court Rules of.Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Brett M. Ellman, Petitioner · 2010

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

ARMEN, Special Trial.Judcge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in-effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2006, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Tessie A. Manuel, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b),`the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinionAshall not be treated as precedent .for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is,not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Amanda Gentry, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Edward Greene, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be enter ed is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Asif Hafeez, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b),'the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

JACOBS, Judge : This case was heard pursuant-to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered-is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Maurice Byles, Petitioner · 2010

DEAN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463, of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was''filed ., Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not'reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Dana L. Acoba, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

LARD, judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provision s of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when th e petition was filedJ1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the, decision to be entered is nolt reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the deci- sion to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the : .provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue .

provisions of section 7463 of-the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any- Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section- references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of.

MARVEL, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any-other court, an d 'Subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, in effect for the relevant period .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r case .

FOLLOWED Tomasz Koziej, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b),', the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other ; case .

FOLLOWED James L. Wright, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to .the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .l Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code i n effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules .of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Donald R. Hill, Petitioner · 2010

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge :' This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be enteredis not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicateid, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are-to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Ming Zeng, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision t o 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect SERVED APR 212010 - 2 - when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by-any other court , and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r case .

Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in,effect for 2006, the taxable year in issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court,' and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other: case .

THORNTON, Judge : These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are no t 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code .

FOLLOWED Laura A. Brady, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable 'Unless otherwise indicated, section .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewabl e 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7 .463 of ,the Internal Revenue Code (cid:127)in effect "when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b) ., the decision to be-entered is not .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended and in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure ., SERVED FEB 2 2 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Jay A. Durrance, Petitioner · 2010

{ ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time that the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the-Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in(cid:127)effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 'Unless otherwise indicated,.

FOLLOWED Patricia Conway, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

THORNTON, Judge : These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are no t 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the InternalRevenue Code .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Indrit Iljazi, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for-any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinio n 1 Unless otherwise indicated ; all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Hong Zhu, Petitioner · 2010

LARO, Judge : This case was heard, pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the applicable versions of the Internal Revenue Code, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

.ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .l Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinio n 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise indicated.

FOLLOWED Joan M. Simcox, Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b),' the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 'All section references are the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise indicated .

FOLLOWED Ken Ryan, Inc., Petitioner · 2010

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, -All'-section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated .

petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue.

FOLLOWED Lisa R. Coleman, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated, as precedent for any other case .

-Pursuant to section 7463(b),-the decision to be .

Internal Revenue-Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is,not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as preceden t for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this' .opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Dean Gochis, Petitioner · 2009

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the 'Unless otherwise indicated,jall section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be-entered is not reviewable by any other court,-:and 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Janet S. Smiley, Petitioner · 2009

GERBER, Judae : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Teresa Johnson, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered 'Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to sections refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U .S .C .) in effect for the tax year at issue, and all citations to Rules refer to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision t o 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended .

FOLLOWED Ronald Colquitt, Petitioner · 2009

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code for the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure , unless otherwise indicated .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant-to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect, when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax .Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2005, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not .be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

CHIECHI, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provi- sions of'section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the deci- sion to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Darlene Martinez, Petitioner · 2009

LARO, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years .in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED York T. Huang, Petitioner · 2009

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

LARO, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

LARO, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d .'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the applicable versions of the Internal Revenue Code, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court,-and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Jody Lynn Harper, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in'effect .for 2003, the taxable year under consideration, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not`reviewabl.e by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tak Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

THORNTON', Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court,, and ' All subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code , as amended .

FOLLOWED Matthew Rice, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered 'Unless otherwise indicated, all citations.

FOLLOWED Irina Agronin, Petitioner · 2009

pursuant to the provisions of-section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed in each such case .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered 'Hereinafter, all section references are to the Internal Revenue, Code (Code) .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2005, the taxable year at .issue .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the.-Internal Revenue Code as amended, and all Rule references'are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Regine C. Yang, Petitioner · 2009

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judad : These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered ' Unless otherwise indicated, all siaction references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Donald Addie, Petitioner · 2009

in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated,'all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue .

FOLLOWED Regine C. Yang, Petitioner · 2009

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judah : These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect forlthe years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

GALE, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisio n 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as in effect for the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Virginia Agosto, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable-by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , ,the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all-section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision t o 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Vincent Marquez, Petitioner · 2009

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable; by I p 1 Unless otherwise indicatedl, all section references arei,,to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Donald A. Benzin, Petitioner · 2009

Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code'in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Stella A. DeVito, Petitioner · 2009

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge :' This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 746 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition Was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Aaron Lee Hill, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated a s precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the,Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Ruletreferences are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Regina Lynn, Petitioner · 2009

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all ubsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue code in effect for 2005, the taxable year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Antoine Haber, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any .other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

GERBER,, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), th e decision to be entered is not" reviewable by any other court, and 'Unless otherwise indicated, all seetion references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Walter N. Maimon, Petitioner · 2009

GOEKE, Judge : This case is before the Court pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated .

FOLLOWED Jill E. Hager, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the-Internal Revenue,Code in effect when the petition was fi(cid:127)led .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant periods .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinio n shall not be treated as precedent for any.

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the, decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for period under consideration .

FOLLOWED Ako D. Thomas, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Pro

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section-7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable-by any ' Unless otherwise .indicated, allFsubsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue.

CHIECHI, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provi- sions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the deci- sion to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and thi s .opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Lee Thomas, Petitioner · 2009

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in' effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered fs not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, .all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the .year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED John H. Wong, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by_any other court, and this-opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to'be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as,precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge :, This caste was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue'Code in effect for 2005, the taxable year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure..

FOLLOWED Lori Novak, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by-any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Preston B. Handy, Petitioner · 2009

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge : These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice an d Procedure, and amounts are rounded .

was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is notireviewable by any 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Code), as amended; in effect for the relevant period.

FOLLOWED Fedor Ratnikov, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not~be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to'be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Petitioners filed the petition in this case pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time that petition wa s SERVED Mar 19 2009 2 - filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entere d is'not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Domell T. Moore, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , 'Unless otherwise indicated, all citations of sections refer to the Internal.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be ;entered is'not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), .

FOLLOWED John F. Kyne, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), .the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any .other case .

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judae : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is-not reviewable by 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal .

FOLLOWED Danny M. Knight, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not revieable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated a precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as.

FOLLOWED John Delgado, Petitioner · 2009

LARO, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when th e petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as 'precedent for any other 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all s ction references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to-the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for' the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7"463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed'.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED David Le, Petitioner · 2009

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge : These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 o f the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were 4 OERVED JUL 1 32009 2 - filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered in each docket is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section-7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered, is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable-by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Adam Sanchez, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2009-167 · 2009

WHERRY, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .l Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for the tax year at issue .

FOLLOWED Preston B. Handy, Petitioner · 2009

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge : These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice an d Procedure, and amounts are rounded .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was-heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended and in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is-not reviewable by-an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended , in effect for the 'relevant period .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Virginia Mann, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not .reviewable by any other court, and this .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2005, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are, to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Monty E. Stone, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to Section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2005, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This Lase was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the I~'ternal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is rot reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all 'subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for th e taxable years in issue .

FOLLOWED Kennie Blackmon, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to-be entered ; is not reviewable by any other Court, and this opinion shall no t be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Angela Lee Sloan, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , and this opinion shall not be treated as-precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Irina Agronin, Petitioner · 2009

' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entere d 'Hereinafter, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the years at issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Glenda J. Strand, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2004, the taxable year in issue .

GALE, Judge : This- case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b),the decisio n 'Unless otherwise indicated , all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as in effect for the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

at the time that the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be ent red is not reviewable by ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue ;ode in effect for 2003, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Ta x Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other .court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Kevin Stockton, Petitioner · 2009

LARO, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Lisa R. Coleman, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period .

FOLLOWED David M. Redmond, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewa le by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as recedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and,this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), th e decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Joseph Hakim, Petitioner · 2009

CHIECHI, Jude : This case was heard pursuant to the provi- sions of section 7463 of the'Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the deci- sion to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Andrea Farina, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

WELLS, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Glenda J. Strand, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b) ; the decision to be entered is not reviewable b y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are'to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for'the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed..' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable b y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for.

FOLLOWED David & Trang Le, Petitioner · 2009

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge : These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 o f the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were 4 OERVED JUL 1 32009 2 - filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered in each docket is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code -ineffect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered-is not reviewable by any other court, and 'Section references are to the applicable versions of the, Internal Revenue Code .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case(cid:127)was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and,this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other SERVED Sep 22 2009 r 2 case .

FOLLOWED George Taboh, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for'any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all .section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice an d Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in-effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the .

FOLLOWED Sharon R. Davis, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , SERVED Apr 30 2009 and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .' Respondent determined a Federal income tax deficiency of $2,695 for 2004 .

WHERRY, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to section 746 3 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entere d 'All subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for the tax year at issue.

FOLLOWED Isabel Atizol, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue-Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Park, for respondent ., LARO, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision'to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references ate to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the year in issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Robert Ruiz, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2005, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

CHIECHI, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provi- sions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the deci sion to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED VanLan T. Bui, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'All subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 74163 .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, sectio~ references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge :- This case was heard pursuant to the provisions .of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not .reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated a s precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Hatem Elsayed, Petitioner · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Mollie E. Smith, Petitioner · 2009

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue 'Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the year at issue ., Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Richard S. Moulton, Jr., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2009-38 · 2009

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not b e 'Cases of the following petitioners are consolidated herewith : Timothy A .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

SERVED Aug 25 2008 when the petitions were fi-led..2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court , and"this"'"opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other Petitioner sought relief from joint and several tax liability'for 1994, 1995, and 1996 .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Muhammad McNeill, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period .

FOLLOWED Larry W. Koepke, Petitioner · 2008

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2003, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Pro

NIMS, Judge : This case was healyd pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revelnue Code in effect when the petition was filed : Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision t o be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinio n shall not be treated as precedent fdr any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not e treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2004, the taxable year .at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as preceden t for any other case .

FOLLOWED Dawn Lea Black, Petitioner · 2008

) SERVED JUN 3 0 2008 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this o inion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisi n to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case Unless otherwise SERVED FEB 2 8 2008 - 2 - indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court

FOLLOWED Reginald Jarrett, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r case .

FOLLOWED Dennis Wilson, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

VASQUEZ, Judge : This case was-heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r case .

RUWE,' Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provision s of section 7463 of the Intertlal .Re'enue Code in effect when th e petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisio n to be entered is not reviewa)le,by any other court, and thi s opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be .entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Renita Rose Best, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated , all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period .

FOLLOWED Andrea C. Casula, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Joseph Jellen, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Orlie E. Fay, Petitioner · 2008

HAINES, Judge : These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is n t reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not e treated as precedent for any other case .

WHERRY, Judge : This case was heard 1 pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as ineffect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to th$ Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

DAWSON, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the ' Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for the year at issue, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

SERVED Aug 25 2008 when the petitions were fi-led..2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court , and"this"'"opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other Petitioner sought relief from joint and several tax liability'for 1994, 1995, and 1996 .

FOLLOWED Marilyn L. Raga, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and references 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section are to the Internal Revenue.

WHERRY, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Dempsie Word, Petitioner · 2008

VASQUEZ, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

VASQUEZ, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

FOLLOWED Jue-Ya Yang, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2005, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

RUWE, Judge : This case was brought pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended .

GOEKE, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y I Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Peter Showler, Petitioner · 2008

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED David K. Carlson, Petitioner · 2008

WHERRY, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Fred Hoffman, Petitioner · 2008

THORNTON, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1 Unless'otherwise indicated,' section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in effect for the year in issue .

GOEKE, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other .case .

FOLLOWED William N. Ward, Petitioner · 2008

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to .the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2004, the taxable year at issue .

FOLLOWED Kanokwan Smith, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be ;entered is not reviewable by any other court , and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 74 63.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is n of reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amend d, in effect for the relevant period .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was-filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not revie able by any other court, and 1 Unless otherwise indicated, a 1 section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in ffect for 2004, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule reference are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

WELLS, Judge : This case was heard pursuant-to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the-decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue .

FOLLOWED Clarissa Ybarra, Petitioner · 2008

JACOBS, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Marko Filipovich, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Linda C. Rice, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Eugenia Gonzalez, Petitioner · 2008

VASQUEZ, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice an d Procedure .

WELLS, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the 'Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, and all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as in effect for the years in issue .

FOLLOWED Juliet Hess, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

VASQUEZ, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Zenebe Worota, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b),' the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Joseph Jellen, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

THORNTON, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the ' Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in effect for the year in issue .

RUWE, Judge : This case was brought pursuant to th e provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section .

FOLLOWED Roni Ytshaky, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2003 and 2004, the taxable years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Orlie E. Fay, Petitioner · 2008

HAINES, Judge : These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Teresa M. Brown, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the , decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Reynard Campbell, Petitioner · 2008

WHERRY, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entere d 'All subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for the tax year at issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2005, the taxable year in issue .

FOLLOWED Karen Hodsdon, Petitioner · 2008

HAINES,- Judge : This-case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Infernal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as in effect fior the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tak Court; Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Mehdi Taghadoss, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is not review le by any other court, sa and this opinion shall not be treated a recedent for any other case .

HALPERN, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1 Hereafter, unless otherwise noted, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

DAWSON, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b) the decision to be entere d 'Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Roger A. Green, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be cited as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2005, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

RUWE, Judge : This case was brought pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

JACOBS, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 'Subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Bernie Riley, Petitioner · 2008

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Luis Bivieca, Petitioner · 2008

THORNTON, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the i decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d ' Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the .Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in effect for the year in issue, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice an d Procedure .

FOLLOWED Lydia Velazquez, Petitioner · 2008

THORNTON, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1 All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code for the taxable year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Bettie J. Ingram, Petitioner · 2008

WELLS, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Marco E. Brown, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

SERVED JUN 3 0 2008 2 - effect when the petition was filed .2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2004, the taxable year in issue.

VASQUEZ, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Joseph Cornelius, Petitioner · 2008

SERVED APR 2 3 2008 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion .shall not be cited as precedent for any other case .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2005, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

SERVED JAN 3 0 2008 - 2 - when the petition was filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 1 Unless otherwise indicated , all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2002 , the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Joseph D. & Rebecca K. Lease, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2008-73 · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2002, the taxable year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Steven F. Ohrman, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any .'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in.

FOLLOWED Michael Artayet, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not b e 'Cases of the following petitioners are consolidated herewith : Timothy A.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisi n to be entered is no t 1 Petitioner married after filing e petition .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as 1 Both petitioners signed the petition.

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2005, the taxable year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Robert A. Eder, Petitioner · 2008

THORNTON, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision t o 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisionto be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Joseph Cornelius, Petitioner · 2008

SERVED APR 2 3 2008 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion .shall not be cited as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Akin Falodun, Petitioner · 2008

SERVED JAN 7 2008 - 2 - effect when the petition was filed .2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Jonathan L. Hall, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not b e 'Cases of the following petitioners are consolidated herewith : Timothy A .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Micheal Holmes, Petitioner · 2008

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Antonio O. Neal, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Willie Albert, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Forrest Jackson, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b),2 the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2001, the taxable year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

DEAN, Special Trial Judge : These consolidated cases heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the I n Revenue Code in effect at the time the petitions were fil e Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not',be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Pearlena Wallace, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the-decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

DEAN, Special Trial Judge : These consolidated case s heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the I Revenue Code in effect at the time the petitions were fil o Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered Ore not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED John Haynes, Jr., Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to the Tax Courts Rules of Practice and Procedure, and all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Cindee J. Conner, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

HAINES, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Shlomo Limor, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

VASQUEZ, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is no t SERVED SEP - 6 2007 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Bruce Millard, Petitioner · 2007

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

CARLUZZO , Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any .

FOLLOWED Abdul Kamara, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion SERVED JUN 21 2007 - 2 - shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Wayne Smith, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rule

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case for the redetermination of deficiencies was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period .

FOLLOWED Manuel R. Chavez, Petitioner · 2007

WHERRY, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ' All subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2003, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be ERVED MAY 2 9 2007 - 2 - entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Rhonda D. White, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Jin Xiong, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by .ahy other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Cheryl Kunsman, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case for the redetermination of a deficiency was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1 Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

WHERRY, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered 1 All subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for the taxable year at issue .

DAWSON, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years in issue.

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Robert A. White, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED John S. Burke, Petitioner · 2007

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Sharon T. Myrick, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Abboud Kore, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect during the periods at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

WHERRY, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are'not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

POWELL, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to .

FOLLOWED Daniel L. Ostrom, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Fred A. Windover, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

FOLLOWED Francine Edwards, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

JACOBS, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 'Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision t o be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinio n shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 'All section and Code references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unles s otherwise indicated.

FOLLOWED Wayne B. Bailey, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-54 · 2007

VASQUEZ, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and ' Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Howard K. Hager, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable ''by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ,other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered i not reviewable by 1 With the consent of the parties, the Chief Judge reassigned this case, after the death of Spe ial Trial Judge Carleton D .

FOLLOWED Sharon T. Myrick, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b),2 the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any, other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

HAINES, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended .

FOLLOWED Diana L. Gray, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision t o ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Greg Griffin, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to,be entered is not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

) SERVED DEC - 3 2007 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED James J. Spuches, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-164 · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

RUWE, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisio n 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Andrew S. Cirbo, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is no t .SERVED MAY 2 4 2007 - 2 - reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

VASQUEZ, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, and all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue.

FOLLOWED Steven A. Dykes, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Norman P. Schiff, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Amjad A. Sheikh, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

DAWSON, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b) the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED William W. Brown, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision t o ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Ibrahim B. Keita, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

JACOBS, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b) , 'Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Neil J. Norman, Petitioner · 2007

WHERRY, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

SERVED Jyy - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

GALE, Jud e : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 .

FOLLOWED Jack D. Eller, Petitioner · 2007

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

POWELL, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect for the year in issue, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Orlando Bujosa, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

FOLLOWED Paula L. Wilson, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Norman P. Schiff, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Lillie M. Tripp, Petitioner · 2007

JACOBS, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , 'Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

MARVEL, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d 'All subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code , unless otherwise indicated.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision t o 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 .1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Robert H. Martin, Petitioner · 2007

COUVILLION, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed.' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are no t reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not b e treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED McLu Buah, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be - 2 - treated as precedent.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Peter Buah, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN , Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2004, the taxable year in issue .

FOLLOWED Richard G. Keene, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Thomas Lettieri, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b),' the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 1 All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect during the period at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

FOLLOWED Michael Eisler, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the I.nternal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

RUWE, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisio n 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), th e FQ MAR 15 2001 - 2 - decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Robert F. Dillon, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be treated as precedent for any other case .

FOLLOWED Bonnie L. Duncan, Petitioner · 2007

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any othe r 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entere d ~~ .2920031 2 - 2 - is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years in issue .

FOLLOWED James A. Nielsen, Petitioner · 2007

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time that the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2000 and 2001, the taxable years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years in issue .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be SERVED MAY 2 4 2007 entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

- 2 - filed.2 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

7463(b) precludes our Summary Opinions' being treated as precedent in any other cases, our Rules do not prohibit the citation ofSummary Opinions, so that we may give consideration to our reasoning and conclusions in such opinions to the extent that they are,persuasive. Because the Commissioner conceded the validity ofajoint return executed by

2Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended and in effect for the taxable years 2013, 2014, (continued...) SERVED Jul 10 2018 -2- section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

2Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended and in effect for the taxable years 2013, 2014, (continued...) SERVED Jul 10 2018 -2- section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Jul 10 2017 - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered in this case is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule (continued...) ssRVED APR - 1 2014 - 2 - the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

8ERVED SEP - 4 2014 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decisionto be entered is not reviewableby any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SWED AUG -6 2012 - 2 - for any other case.

Benjamin Burton, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-72 · 2012

Pursuant IUnless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2009, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of (continued...) SERVED JUL 2320p - 2 - to section 7463(b), the cec sion to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not te treated as precedent for any other case.

Koprowski v. Commissioner 138 T.C. 54 · 2012

Under Rule 174(b), “Trials of small tax cases will be conducted as informally as possible consistent with orderly procedure, and any evidence deemed by the Court to have probative value shall be admissible.” Section 7463(b) provides as follows: SEC.

Dwight F. & Theresa S. Delano, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-105 · 2011

SERVED AUG 2 9 2011 - 2 - Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Kenneth Nordeen, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-104 · 2011

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursu nt to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not re iewable by an y SERVED NOV 21 2007 -2- other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other cases .

Under section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion may not be treated as precedent for any other case. Acuity Brand Lighting (Acuity) made a payment to Ms. Quevy to settle a claim of wrongful termination, and Ms. Quevy excluded 90% of that payment from her gross income for 2018. Taxpayers may exclude

Served 11/16/21 - 2 - to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Served 08/12/21 - 2 - to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

de in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the relevant times, and all Rule references are to the (continued...) SERVED May 20 2020 - 2 - section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Oct 31 2019 - 2 - Under section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

); see sec. 7463(a)(1). We dismissed that case for lack ofjurisdiction because the petition was filed more than 90 days after the IRS issued the notice of deficiency. See sec. 6213(a). Although decisions in small tax cases are not ap- pealable, see sec. 7463(b), petitioner appealed. The U.S. Court ofAppeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed his appeal for lack ofjurisdiction on December 8, 2014. In an effort to collect petitioner's unpaid liabilities for 2009 and 2010, the IRS sent him on March

SUMMARY OPINION LAUBER, Judge: This collection due process (CDP) case was heard pur- suant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Intemal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Under section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is ¹All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SERVED Feb 06 2018 - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Mar 12 2018 - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant SERVED Oct 04 2018 - 2 - to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.¹ Respondent seeks repayment from petitioners ofadvance payments made on their behalfofthe premium assistance credit under section 36B, Refundable Credit for Coverage Under a Qualified Health Plan,

All monetary amounts are rounded (continued...) SERVED Apr 02 2018 - 2 - section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion may not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GALE, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED Sep 24 2018 - 2 - to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

(continued...) SERVED Mar 06 2017 - 2 - section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Sep 07 2017 - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

(continued...) SERVED Mar 06 2017 - 2 - section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Feb 06 2017 -2- to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant to SERVED Aug 28 2017 -2- section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.¹ This case is before the Court on petitioner's motion for an award of reasonable litigation or administrative costs filed pursuant to section 7430 and Rules 230 through 233.

SUMMARY OPINION MORRISON, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.¹ Pursuant to ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all references to sections are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED Sep 07 2017 - 2 - section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Jan 11 2017 - 2 - section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED May 01 2017 - 2 - Under section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Mar 23 2017 - 2 - section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION BUCH, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Under section 7463(b), the ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SERVED Oct 26 2016 - 2 - to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Aug 31 2016 - 2 - section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Dec132016 - 2 - to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Sep 07 2016 - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant SERVED Dec 12 2016 - 2 - to section 7463(b),¹ the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Jul 05 2016 - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Dec 01 2016 - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Sep 29 2015 -2- ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED APR 1 3 2015 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

e in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuant to ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED Sep 15 2015 -2- section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ' Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2011, the taxable year in issue.

SUMMARY OPINION BUCH, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Under section 7463(b), the ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED Jul - 7 2015 - 2 - decision to be entered in this case is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion may not be treated as precedent for any

ted a tax return that was not signed by his spouse and was missing a Form W-2. R The Commissioner sent the return back to the taxpayerwith instructions to correct the defects, and the taxpayerthen resubmitted the return within the time provided by ¹°Sec. 7463(b) precludes Summary Opinions from being treated as precedent in other cases, but this Court's Rules do not prohibit citations ofSummary Opinions to the extent they are persuasive. - 17 - [*17] the Commissioner. This Court did not impose an

SUMMARY OPINION BUCH, Judge: This case was heard pursuantto section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Under section 7463(b), the ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED MAR - 2 2015 - 2 - decision to be entered in this case is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion may not be treated as precedent for any

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect for 2010, and Rule references are to the Tax Court SERVED FEB 2 3 2015 -2- any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for

SERVED Nov 19 2015 - 2 - to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decisionto be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED JUL 1 6 2014 - 2 - suant to section 7463(b), the decisionto be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED DEC 3 0 2014 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Jun 16 2014 - 2 - to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuantto section 7463(b), 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended and in effect for 2009 and 2010, and all Rule (continued...) SERVED APR 2 2 2014 -2- the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED AUG 2 6 2014 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Sep 11 2014 : - 2 - Pursuant tosection 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.¹ Pursuantto section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect at all relevant times.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the 8ERVED SEP - 2 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED AUG 19 2014 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, andthis opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED DEC 2 9 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Oct 16 2014 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED SEP 2 3 2014 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decisionto be entered is notreviewable by any other courd, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION THORNTON, ChiefJudge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect whenthe petitionwas filed.¹ Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decisionto be entered is not reviewable by 'All other section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in (continued...) SERVED APR 1 6 2014 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decisionto be entered is not reviewable by ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED MAR 1 0 2014 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

$ERVED SEP - 4 2014 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decisionto be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED JUN 2 3 2014 - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED MAR 1 1 2014 2 for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not ¹Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period.

SERVED JUN - 9 2014 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent.

SERVED OCT 2 9 2014 - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any SERVED JUL 0720f4 - 2 - other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARYOPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Aug 25 2014 -2- petition was filed.¹ Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue (continued...) SERVED g - 6 2014 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463(f)(1) ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Apr 28 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED JUL 1 0 2014 - 2 - for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, in effect at all relevanttimes, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED FEB 0 6 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for and other case.

SERVED MAY 15 2014 -2- suant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), ¹All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) in effect forthe year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

.SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the SERVED Apr 15 2014 - 2 - petition was filed.¹ Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: This case is being consideredpursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was $68VE9 SEP 1 9 2013 - 2 - filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED FEB 2 1 2013 - 2 - to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED JUL 2 2 2013 - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED DEC 12 20Ú - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GUY, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was SERVED OCT 2 1 2013 - 2 - filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant SERVED HAy 15 2013 -2- to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

in effect when the petition was filed.' 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years in issue and all Rule references are to (continued...) SERVED NOV - 4 2013 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CHIECHI, Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the peti- | SERVED OCT 2 1 2013 - 2 - tions were filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CHIECHI, Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the peti- | SERVED OCT 2 1 2013 - 2 - tions were filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION BUCH, Judge: These cases were heard pursuant to section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed.' Pursuant to 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED NOV 18 2013 - 2 - section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion may not be treated as precedent for any other case.

All Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED FEB 2 1 2013 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

All Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED Feb 06 2013 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION BUCH, Judge: These cases were heard pursuant to section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petitions were filed.' Pursuant to 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal (continued...) SERVED NOV 18 2013 - 2 - section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion may not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION BUCH, J_udge: This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Under section 7463(b), the 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SERVED DEC -9 2013 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b),1 the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant togsection 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVED JUL 222013 - 2 - for any other case.

Pursuant to i SERVED DEC 1 7 2012 - 2 - section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant SERVED t%Y -7 2012 - 2 - to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

5 2012 -2- to section 7463(b),1 the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Respondent objected because the amount in dispute for 2007, including the deficiency and the penalty, exceeded $50,000. See sec. 7463(a), (e). The motion was denied. Petitioners continue to argue that this case qualifies for section 7463 status because the deficiency (ignoring the penalty) is less than $50,000 and their computations s

S&9VEÓ kl0L1 9 2012 - 2 - ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

- 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Luudge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.' Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION SWIFT, Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1All other section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: These consolid ted cases were heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Interna Revenue Code in effect when the RVED OCT 2 5 20tB -2- petitions were filed.1 Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of (continued...) SERVED DEC -4 2012 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

ct when the petition was filed.1 IUnless otherwise indicated all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as in effect for the year at issue and all Rule references are to the Tax (continued...) SERVED DEC 2 0 2012 -2- Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED fl0VJ9 2012 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: These consolid ted cases were heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Interna Revenue Code in effect when the RVED OCT 2 5 20tB -2- petitions were filed.1 Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION MARVEL, Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended and in effect for the year at issue, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure.

Pur(cid:0)541uatnot section 7463(b), the 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

SERVED MP- 5_2012 - 2 - Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

$$RVED /JUL 1 8 2012 - 2 - to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to 'Unless otherwise indicatec, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect fo- the years at issue, and all Rule references are to (continued...) SERVED Jul 11 2012 - 2 - be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuantto the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevantperiod.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent SERVRO J1JLJL 7 2012 - 2 - for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION MARVEL, _J_ugige: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by IUnless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references (continued...) SERVED JÜl - 2 2012 - 2 - any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SERVED Feb 13 2012 - 2 - SUMMARY OPINION GERBER, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463 ofthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.i Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant asRVED R 6 202 - 2 - to section 7463(b),' the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the (continued...) ggino APR i D 2012 - 2 - be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

SUMMARY OPINION WELLS, Judae: The petition in this case was filed pursuant to the provisions ofsection 7463.1 Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be 1Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant ito section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviéwable y any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not NAY 29 2012 - 2 - reviewable by any oth r court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant SgfMEB NAR 222012 - 2 - to section 7463(b),1 the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Pursuant 'to section 7463(b), the decision to 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended and in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursúant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other IUnless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2007, the taxable year in issue.

of a professional gambler other than the costs of wagers, should no longer-be followed. We accordingly hold that petitioner is entitled to deduct under section 162(a) the $10,968 in business "(...continued) 55. We do not cite Orr as precedent, see sec. 7463(b), but merely to document the Commissioner's concession in that case that gambling-related travel expenses of a professional gambler were deductible notwithstanding sec. 165(d). "Moreover, respondent's reliance on Offutt in this case to den

Pursuant tio section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not^be treated as precedent for any other case. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to SERVED AUG 3 1 2011 - 2 - the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2007, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice an

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the In ernal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pufsuant t!o section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue C de in ffect for the year in 1ssue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Pursuant tb section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any.other case.

- 2 - section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case. This proceeding was commenced under section 6015(e) for review of respondent's determination that petitioner is not entitled to relief from joint and several liability with respect to underpayments

Mayo v. Commissioner 136 T.C. 81 · 2011

ec. 162(a), and that take-off fees raised the issue of whether they should be construed as a component of a wager’s cost rather than a business expense. See also Orr v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2010-55. We do not cite Orr as precedent, see sec. 7463(b), but merely to document the Commissioner’s concession in that case that gambling-related travel expenses of a professional gambler were deductible notwithstanding sec. 165(d). Moreover, respondent’s reliance on Offutt in this case to den

HAINES, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the pirovisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to -section 7463(b), the decisionato be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Iinternal Revenue Code as amended.

to section 7463(b), the decision to 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure . SERVED Aug 02 2010 2 - be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other cas

Rhiannon G. O'Donnabhain, Petitioner 134 T.C. No. 4 · 2010

29Respondent contends that petitioner's hormone therapy was a "similar procedure" within the meaning of sec .

This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of'the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to 'section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by'any other court, and this .

Pursuant-to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court , and this opinion shall .not be treated as precedent for any othe r 'All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times .

Pursuant to ;section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered'is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case . 'Unless otherwise indicated, section. references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect for the relevant period . SERVED JUL 1 4 2010 In a final notice of determination d

Pursuant' to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are.

Pursuant ' to '-section 7463(b), the decision to b entered is note reviewable by any other court, and this opiri 'on ''shall hot be treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant' to section 7463(b), the decisions to be entered are.

O'Donnabhain v. Commissioner 134 T.C. 34 · 2010

Respondent contends that petitioner’s hormone therapy was a “similar procedure” within the meaning of sec. 213(d)(9)(A). Petitioner also argues that the expenditures for the procedures at issue are deductible because they affected a structure or function of the body (within the meaning of sec. 213(d)(1)(A)) and were not “cosmetic surg

DEAN, Special Trial Judge :, This case was'heard pursuant to' the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .{„'Pursuant : to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this - opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other ' case .

Pu suant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not revie able by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated a precedent for any other case .

Pursuantto section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this.

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' P rsuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is of reviewable by an y 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue ode in effect for 2004, the taxable year at issue, and all Rule', references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pu suant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is not revi e able by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treate d precedent for any other case .

} PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial-Judcre: This case was heard 44 E N pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Interna l Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed ..' Pursuanti o section 7463(b)., the decision to be entered is not reviewable',, 1 Unless otherwise in Licated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the TaX Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an y 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure . '~ SERVED Dec 01 2009 I 2 - other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant to .section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not 'Unless otherwise indicated, section references 'are to the Code in effect for the year at issue, Rule references are to the .

MORRISON, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the,Internal Revenue Code, as in effect when the petition was filed.' Under section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and I 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to she Internal Revenue Code (Code) .

Pursuant to, section 7463(b), the decision to 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended, and all Rule references Ire to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant .to section 7463(b), the decision to be .

) SERVED Apr 15 2009 2 - section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as prece- dent for any other case .

Pursuant-to section 7463(b),, the decision to .be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and,this opinion shall not,be,treated as preceden t for any other case .

P rsuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not revi wable by any other court , and this opinion should not be' treated as precedent for any other case .

Pursuant 'to section 7463(b), the' decision to be entered is not.reviewable by any other court,-and .

DEAN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 ofsthe Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition .was filed .-.- Pursuant-to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant ,to to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, an d ' Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2004, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

rsuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not r viewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be t eated as precedent for any other case .

GOEKE Judge : This .case was -heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the InternalRevenue Code,i effect when the petition was filed .' Pursuant.h`to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other cou t, and 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references re to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to .the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

1 Unless indicated otherwise, all section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code If 1986 as in effect for the year in issue, except as to sec . 7 63, which is as in effect for proceedings commenced on the date he petition in the instant case was filed . SERVED APR 2 9 2008 2 - Respondent determined a deficiency in F

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' Pursi ant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all su sequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pur want to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewble by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

COMMISSIONS OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent VASQUEZ, Judge: his case was heard'pursuant,to the provisions of section 463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effec t when the petition was fled.' Pursuant` to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is°not reviewable by any other court, an d 1 Unless otherwis indicated, all'subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the'Tax Court Rule s of Practice and Proced re .

1978-288 at 6 (collateral estoppel “in no way conflicts with the ‘no precedent’ provisions of section 7463(b)”); Wilkerson v.

RUWE, Judge : Ths case was'heard pursuant to the provisions of section ~7463 ofthe internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed .' ursuant to section 7463(b), the decision 1 Unless otherwis indicated, all .section,references are to the Internal Revenue C de in effect.

Puruant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not review ble by any other court , 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all ection references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as am 'nded and in effect for the years in issue .

Mitchell v. Commissioner 131 T.C. 215 · 2008

This means that the Commissioner has a problem — Congress, by enacting section 7463(b), has shattered whatever chain of appellate review might otherwise have been available to the Mitchells after our Court decided Mitchell I.

Pursuant o section 7463(b), the decision is not reviewable by any other co rt, and thi s 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all sectio references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .

Pursuant to the provisions of section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

) 'SERVED OCT 2 2 2007 2 - of section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case .

COUVILLION, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed.' Pursuant to the provisions of section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewabl e 'Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue .

Pu suant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not rev iewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be tre ated as precedent for any other case .

Bea-Jaye Ware, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-112 · 2007

7463(b), summary opinions are not treated as precedent for any other case, and we do not consider further petitioner’s argument as it relates to Browda. - 15 - outweighed by the significant benefit petitioner received from the underpayment, her knowledge or reason to know that the reported liability would be unpaid, and her failure to demonst

opinion in Gilmore v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2004-50, respondent concedes that petitioner is entitled to deduct $5,424 under sec. 215 as spousal maintenance in tax year 1999. However, the remaining $15,600 is still at issue. Pursuant to sec. 7463(b), a summary opinion cannot be relied upon as precedent for other cases. However, this statutory prohibition does not necessarily preclude application of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. Because the taxpayer and issue

Pamela J. Ellison, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2004-57 · 2004

Relief Under Section 6015(b) To qualify for relief from joint and several liability under section 6015(b)(1), a taxpayer must establish: (A) a joint return has been made for a taxable year; (B) on such return there is an understatement of tax attributable to erroneous items of 1 individual filing the joint return; - 19 - (C) the o

1This Court generally applies the law in a manner consistent with the holdings of the Court of Appeals to which an appeal of its decision lies, Golsen v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 742 (1970), affd. 445 F.2d 985 (10th Cir. 1971), even in cases subject to sec. 7463(b). But for the provisions of sec. 7463(b), the decision in this case would be appealable to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Sec. 7482(b)(1)(A). - 6 - postmarked, that date is the date that controls.” Lewis v. United States

jury which results in physical injury is within the scope of the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. ch. 5 (2000), has no application with respect to the provisions of sec. 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code. 3But for the provisions of sec. 7463(b), the decision in this case would be appealable to the U.S. Court of Appeals for (continued...) - 14 - explicitly held in Benci-Woodward v. Commissioner, 219 F.3d 941 (9th Cir. 2000), affg. T.C. Memo. 1998-395, that nothing in California

ion, petitioner relies on our previous opinion in Wilkerson v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2001-63.7 In that case, we held that money paid to petitioner for the years 1997 and 1998, by virtue of an agreement between GNCC and the 7 Pursuant to sec. 7463(b), a summary opinion cannot be relied on as precedent for other cases. Although this statutory prohibition does not necessarily preclude application of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, neither doctrine applies in this

1 Unless indicated otherwise, all section references, other than to sec. 7463, are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as in effect for the year in issue. - 2 - Respondent determined a deficiency in Federal individual income tax against petitioner for 1999 in the amount of $523. The issue for decision is whether petition

Ann E. Bartak, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2004-83 · 2004

Relief Under Section 6015(b) To qualify for relief from joint and several liability under section 6015(b)(1), a taxpayer must establish: (A) a joint return has been made for a taxable year; (B) on such return there is an understatement of tax attributable to erroneous items of 1 individual filing the joint return; (C) the other ind

son to know of the transaction that gave rise to the understatement. Jonson v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 106, 115 (2002). However, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit3 has adopted what has been labeled a more lenient 3But for the provisions of sec. 7463(b), the decision in this case would be appealable to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. See sec. 7482(b)(1)(A). This Court generally applies the law in a manner consistent with the (continued...) - 6 - approach in cases invo

Richard J. & Phyllis Bot, Petitioner 118 T.C. No. 8 · 2002

uiring, marketing, and selling corn and corn products for profit. - 22 - disregarded under State law simply does not ring true. Petitioners rely primarily on Hansen v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 1998-91, which has no precedential value, see sec. 7463(b), and Felber v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-418, affd. without published opinion 998 F.2d 1018 (8th Cir. 1993), for the proposition that the value-added payments are not subject to self-employment tax. In Felber, we held that a wheat far

ties, and additions to tax in court proceedings arising in connection with examinations commencing after July 22, 1998. The parties stipulated that the examination of petitioner’s returns commenced prior to July 22, 1998. 7 But for the provisions of sec. 7463(b), the decision in this case would be appealable to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. See sec. 7482(b)(1)(A). This Court generally applies the law in a manner consistent with the holdings of the (continued...) - 8 - entered

c)(2)(B), challenged the underlying tax liability for that year. Petitioner did not do that but instead presented a collection alternative under sec. 6330(c)(2)(A)(iii). Thus, the underlying tax liability is not at issue. 6 But for the provisions of sec. 7463(b), the decision in this case would be appealable to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See sec. 7482(b)(1)(A). This Court generally applies the law in a manner consistent with the holdings of the Court of Appeals to which an

stated that a “posting error is an error in ‘the act of transferring an original entry to a ledger.’” Wayne Bolt & Nut Co. v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 500, 510-511 (1989) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1050 (5th ed. 1979)). 4But for the provisions of sec. 7463(b), the decision in (continued...) - 9 - O. Liquidating Corp., 292 F.2d 225 (3d Cir. 1961), revg. T.C. Memo. 1960-29. In O. Liquidating Corp., the taxpayer corporation received annual dividend payments which were attributable to insurance co

Bot v. Commissioner 118 T.C. 138 · 2002

itioners’ argument that the contractually based agency designation may be disregarded under State law simply does not ring true. Petitioners rely primarily on Hansen v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 1998-91, which has no precedential value, see sec. 7463(b), and Felber v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-418, affd. without published opinion 998 F.2d 1018 (8th Cir. 1993), for the proposition that the value-added payments are not subject to self-employment tax. In Felber, we held that a wheat fa

Ronald L. & Mattie L. Alverson, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-101 · 1999

Kozak had represented Mr. Bigelow in a lawsuit against Mr. Kersting for payment of the "equity build-up" in a mortgage funding program (presumably Bauspar) following Mr. Bigelow's termination of the program. Mr. Bigelow won the suit and collected damages. According to Mr. Kozak, Mr. Bigelow had prevailed by virtue of Mr. Kersting'

Terry D. & Gloria K. Owens, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-101 · 1999

Kozak had represented Mr. Bigelow in a lawsuit against Mr. Kersting for payment of the "equity build-up" in a mortgage funding program (presumably Bauspar) following Mr. Bigelow's termination of the program. Mr. Bigelow won the suit and collected damages. According to Mr. Kozak, Mr. Bigelow had prevailed by virtue of Mr. Kersting'

Richard B. & Donna G. Rogers, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-101 · 1999

Kozak had represented Mr. Bigelow in a lawsuit against Mr. Kersting for payment of the "equity build-up" in a mortgage funding program (presumably Bauspar) following Mr. Bigelow's termination of the program. Mr. Bigelow won the suit and collected damages. According to Mr. Kozak, Mr. Bigelow had prevailed by virtue of Mr. Kersting'

John L. & Terry E. Huber, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-101 · 1999

Kozak had represented Mr. Bigelow in a lawsuit against Mr. Kersting for payment of the "equity build-up" in a mortgage funding program (presumably Bauspar) following Mr. Bigelow's termination of the program. Mr. Bigelow won the suit and collected damages. According to Mr. Kozak, Mr. Bigelow had prevailed by virtue of Mr. Kersting'

Hoyt W. & Barbara D. Young, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-101 · 1999

Kozak had represented Mr. Bigelow in a lawsuit against Mr. Kersting for payment of the "equity build-up" in a mortgage funding program (presumably Bauspar) following Mr. Bigelow's termination of the program. Mr. Bigelow won the suit and collected damages. According to Mr. Kozak, Mr. Bigelow had prevailed by virtue of Mr. Kersting'

Foley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 95 F.4th 740 · Cir.
Timothy E. Dexter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 409 F.3d 877 · Cir.
Theodore C. v. Commissioner 128 T.C. 6 · 2007
Dexter, Timothy E. v. CIR · Cir.
Edge v. Commissioner 552 F. App'x 255 · Cir.
Rayle v. Commissioner 594 F. App'x 305 · Cir.