§81 — Repealed. Pub. L. 100–203, title X, § 10201(b)(1), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–387]
40 cases·2 followed·2 distinguished·2 questioned·3 overruled·31 cited—5% support
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §81
[§ 81. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–203, title X, § 10201(b)(1), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–387] Section, added Pub. L. 89–722, § 1(b)(1), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1152; amended Pub. L. 93–625, § 4(c)(1), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2111; Pub. L. 94–455, title VI, § 605(b), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1575; Pub. L. 99–514, title VIII, § 805(c)(1)(A), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2362, included increase in vacation pay suspense account in gross income. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries Effective Date of RepealRepeal applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1987, see section 10201(c)(1) of Pub. L. 100–203, set out as an Effective Date of 1987 Amendment note under section 404 of this title.
40 Citing Cases
may take the form ofa purchase money mortgage. Alternatively, the seller may prefer a long-term installment purchase contract, often called a "contract for deed" or a uniform real estate contract. * * * [Emphasis added.] 14 Powell on Real Property, sec. 81.01[3][e] (M. Wolfed. 2019). But in this case the purported "contract for deed" financed not a portion but a_ll ofthe purchase price and provided not for installments but for a balloon payment after five years. A contract for deed (also referr
at 381 n.4 (citing - 62 - numerous pre-2004 cases involving facade easements), 387-390 (examining the history ofsection 170 and section 1.170A-1(e), Income Tax Regs., and identical wording in section 81.46(a), Estate Tax Regs.
505 (1983); Paula Constr. Co. v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 1055, 1058 (1972) ("It is now settled law that only ifpayment is made with the intent to compensate is it deductible as compensation."), aff'd without published opinion, 474 F.2d 1345 (5th Cir. 1973); Elec. & Neon, Inc. v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 1324, 1340 (1971) (describing intent to
505 (1983); Paula Constr. Co. v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 1055, 1058 (1972) ("It is now settled law that only ifpayment is made with the intent to compensate is it deductible as compensation."), aff'd without published opinion, 474 F.2d 1345 (5th Cir. 1973); Elec. & Neon, Inc. v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 1324, 1340 (1971) (describing intent to
nds that because the subject property has not been designated a landmark, Mr . Friedberg' s options for transferring the unused development rights are is (. . .continued) N. Y. S . 2d 50, 52 (App. Div. 2001) ; see New York, N. Y. , Zoning Resolution sec. 81-744. - 42 - limited to the first option. Petitioners do not squarely address respondent's argument because petitioners failed to identify the relevant law governing the transfer of development rights in New York City. Petitioners premise thei
FASB section 81.06 provides that employers, at a minimum, must disclose (1) a description of the benefits provided and the employee groups covered; (2) a description of the accounting and funding policies followed for those benefits; and 4 Touche Ross's audit was limited, and it did not express an opinion as to certain elements of the financial statemen
gifts or bequests are excluded from a recipient's gross income under section 102(a), the regulations, section 1.102-1(d), Income Tax Regs., “acknowledge that they enjoy this status”. 3 Bittker & Lokken, Federal Taxation of Income, Estates and Gifts, sec. 81.4.7 at 81-46 (2d ed. 1991 & Supp. No. 4 1996).11 b. Section 662(a)(2)(B) Not All-Inclusive The distribution rules of sections 661 and 662, and the exclusion for specific bequests provided by section 663(a)(1) do not exclusively govern the sec