§812 — Definition of company’s share and policyholder’s share
235 cases·35 followed·26 distinguished·4 criticized·1 overruled·169 cited—15% support
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §812
For purposes of section 805(a)(4), the term “company’s share” means, with respect to any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017, 70 percent.
For purposes of section 807, the term “policyholder’s share” means, with respect to any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017, 30 percent.
Treasury Regulations
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-1 Taxable years affected
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-2 Operations loss deduction
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-2(a) Allowance of deduction.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-2(b) Steps in computation of operations loss deduction.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-2(c) Statement with tax return.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-2(d) Ascertainment of deduction dependent upon operations loss carryback.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-2(e) Law applicable to computations.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-2(f) Special rules.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-2(i) §1.812-2(i)
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-3 Computation of loss from operations
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-3(a) §1.812-3(a)
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-3(b) Illustration of principles.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-3(c) Section 245 in respect of dividends received from certain foreign corporations.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-3(i) No deduction shall be allowed under section 812 for the operations loss deduction.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-4 Operations loss carrybacks and operations loss carryovers
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-4(a) In general—(1) Years to which loss may be carried.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-4(b) Portion of loss from operations which is a carryback or a carryover to the taxable year in issue—(1) Manner of computation.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-5 Offset
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-5(a) Facts.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-5(b) Determination of section 809(f) limitation and deduction for dividends to policyholders without regard to the operations loss deduction for 1959.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-5(c) Recomputation of section 809(f) limitation and deduction for dividends to policyholders after application of the operations loss deduction for 1959.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-6 New company defined
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-7 Application of subtitle A and subtitle F
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-8 Illustration of operations loss carrybacks and carryovers
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.812-8(a) Facts.
235 Citing Cases
280E impose exactions for violations ofcriminal laws, which is inapposite to Congress' remedial goal to deter noncompliance in other provisions ofthe Code in their effort to protect the revenue.
Many marijuana businesses have tried to argue their way out of section 280E, but all have been unsuccessful. See Patients Mut. Assistance Collective Corp. v. Commissioner, 151 T.C. 176 (2018) (reiterating applicability of section 280E to state-legal drug sellers), aff’d, 995 F.3d 671 (9th Cir. 2021); see also Olive v. Commissioner, 139 T.C.
This means that under federal law the manufacture, distribution, dispensation, or possession ofmarijuana--even medical marijuana recommended by a physician--is prohibited. See 4 sec. 841(a); Californians Helping to Alleviate Med. Problems, Inc. v. Commissioner (CHAMP), 128 T.C. 173, 181 (2007)(citing United States v. Oakland Canna
Section 261, however, provides that "[i]n computing taxable income, no deduction shall in any case be allowed in respect ofthe items specified in this part." "[T]his part" includes section 280E, Expenditures in Connection With the Illegal Sale ofDrugs.
Section 261, however, provides that "[i]n computing taxable income, no deduction shall in any case be allowed in respect ofthe items specified in this part." "[T]his part" includes section 280E, Expenditures in Connection With the Illegal Sale ofDrugs.
Section 261, however, provides that "[i]n computing taxable income, no deduction shall in any case be allowed in respect ofthe items specified in this part." "[T]his part" includes section 280E, Expenditures in Connection With the Illegal Sale ofDrugs.
Section 261, however, provides that "[i]n computing taxable income, no deduction shall in any case be allowed in respect ofthe items specified in this part." "[T]his part" includes section 280E, Expenditures in Connection With the Illegal Sale ofDrugs.
Section 261, however, provides that "[i]n computing taxable income, no deduction shall in any case be allowed in respect ofthe items specified in this part." "[T]his part" includes section 280E, Expenditures in Connection With the Illegal Sale ofDrugs.
Section 261, however, provides that "[i]n computing taxable income, no deduction shall in any case be allowed in respect ofthe items specified in this part." "[T]his part" includes section 280E, Expenditures in Connection With the Illegal Sale ofDrugs.
This means that under federal law the manufacture, distribution, dispensation, or possession ofmarijuana--even medical marijuana recommended by a physician--is prohibited. See 4 sec. 841(a); Californians Helping to Alleviate Med. Problems, Inc. v. Commissioner (CHAMP), 128 T.C. 173, 181 (2007)(citing United States v. Oakland Canna
This means that under federal law the manufacture, distribution, dispensation, or possession ofmarijuana--even medical marijuana recommended by a physician--is prohibited. See 4 sec. 841(a); Californians Helping to Alleviate Med. Problems, Inc. v. Commissioner (CHAMP), 128 T.C. 173, 181 (2007)(citing United States v. Oakland Canna
812.014(1) (West 2011). A person "obtains or uses" property by either "[t]aking or exercising control," "[m]aking any unauthorized use, disposition or transfer," obtaining the property "by fraud, willful misrepresentation ofa future act, or false promise," or engaging in conduct previously known as embezzlement or other conduct similar in natu
812.014(2) (a)1., in connection with the mismanagement of client funds. On December 17, 2004, he was sentenced to 5 years' incarceration, 10 years' probation, 1,000 hours of community service, and a restitution payment of $357,000 to his clients. On March 2, 2005, petitioner began his period of incarceration; on March 11, 2009, he was released
t" in response do the regulation. See Pension Protection Act of 2006, Pub.t| L. 109-280, sec. 1219, 120 Stat.s 1083,; 'Gulf Opportunity Zone ct of 2005,e Pub. L. 109-135, sec. 403, 119 Stat. 2615; Americ n Jobs Creation Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-357, sec. 812, 118 Stat 1577. The Secretary has folldwed Congress' intent to carve out a specialized set of rules fo the penalties applicable to the accuracy of a return. The application of the regulation is by its terms specifically limi ed to underpayme
2002), and in most other States, see 1 Restatement, Contracts 2d, sec. 15 (1981), although a “compulsion” or “irresistible impulse” standard has been applied on occasion, see Faber v. Sweet Style Manufacturing Corp., 242 N.Y.S.2d 763 (Sup. Ct. 1963). Undue influence, taking advantage of a contracting party’s impaired ability to
We note also that the term “private stockholder or individual” appears in paragraph (2) of section 2055(a) (and its 1939 Code predecessor, section 812(d)), while the term “private shareholder or individual” appears in paragraph (4) of the same section 2055(a).