§821
25 cases·4 followed·1 distinguished·1 criticized·2 limited·17 cited—16% support
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §821
Statute text not available for this section.
25 Citing Cases
ility filing consolidated Federal income tax returns with P, engaged in the retail and wholesale distribution of electricity and related services. Federal income tax rates were reduced in 1986 pursuant to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 821, 100 Stat. 2372, creating an excess in deferred Federal income tax collected from customers of U. U was required to adjust utility rates in 1987 and 1988 to compensate for this overcollection. U was allowed to collect funds equal to its proje
2372, creating an excess in deferred Federal income tax. P was required to adjust utility rates from 1987 through 1990 to compensate for this overcollection. Held: P’s method of accounting for utility services from the unbilled period violates sec. 451(f) and must be disallowed. Held, further, P must adjust the sec. 481 adjustme
2372, creating an excess in deferred Federal income tax. P was required to adjust utility rates from 1987 through 1990 to compensate for this overcollection. Held: P’s method of accounting for utility services from the unbilled period violates sec. 451(f) and must be disallowed. Held, further, P must adjust the sec. 481 adjustme
821.01 (1999) (Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Rule). - 67 - recently adopted by the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Estate of Clarks v. United States, supra. The primary point made by Judges Rives and Brown was that in a practical sense the taxpayer never had control over the portion of the recovery that was retained by h