§861 — Income from sources within the United States

90 citing cases

(a)Gross income from sources within United States

The following items of gross income shall be treated as income from sources within the United States:

(1)Interest

Interest from the United States or the District of Columbia, and interest on bonds, notes, or other interest-bearing obligations of noncorporate residents or domestic corporations not including—

(A)

interest—

(i)

on deposits with a foreign branch of a domestic corporation or a domestic partnership if such branch is engaged in the commercial banking business, and

(ii)

on amounts satisfying the requirements of subparagraph (B) of section 871(i)(3) which are paid by a foreign branch of a domestic corporation or a domestic partnership, and

(B)

in the case of a foreign partnership, which is predominantly engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business outside the United States, any interest not paid by a trade or business engaged in by the partnership in the United States and not allocable to income which is effectively connected (or treated as effectively connected) with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States.

(2)Dividends

The amount received as dividends—

(A)

from a domestic corporation, or

(B)

from a foreign corporation unless less than 25 percent of the gross income from all sources of such foreign corporation for the 3-year period ending with the close of its taxable year preceding the declaration of such dividends (or for such part of such period as the corporation has been in existence) was effectively connected (or treated as effectively connected other than income described in section 884(d)(2)) with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States; but only in an amount which bears the same ratio to such dividends as the gross income of the corporation for such period which was effectively connected (or treated as effectively connected other than income described in section 884(d)(2)) with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States bears to its gross income from all sources; but dividends (other than dividends for which a deduction is allowable under section 245(b)) from a foreign corporation shall, for purposes of subpart A of part III (relating to foreign tax credit), be treated as income from sources without the United States to the extent (and only to the extent) exceeding the amount which is 100/50th of the amount of the deduction allowable under section 245 in respect of such dividends, or

(C)

from a foreign corporation to the extent that such amount is required by section 243(e) (relating to certain dividends from foreign corporations) to be treated as dividends from a domestic corporation which is subject to taxation under this chapter, and to such extent subparagraph (B) shall not apply to such amount, or

(D)

from a DISC or former DISC (as defined in section 992(a)) except to the extent attributable (as determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary) to qualified export receipts described in section 993(a)(1) (other than interest and gains described in section 995(b)(1)).

In the case of any dividend from a 20-percent owned corporation (as defined in section 243(c)(2)), subparagraph (B) shall be applied by substituting “100/65th” for “100/50th”.

(3)Personal services

Compensation for labor or personal services performed in the United States; except that compensation for labor or services performed in the United States shall not be deemed to be income from sources within the United States if—

(A)

the labor or services are performed by a nonresident alien individual temporarily present in the United States for a period or periods not exceeding a total of 90 days during the taxable year,

(B)

such compensation does not exceed $3,000 in the aggregate, and

(C)

the compensation is for labor or services performed as an employee of or under a contract with—

(i)

a nonresident alien, foreign partnership, or foreign corporation, not engaged in trade or business within the United States, or

(ii)

an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, a domestic partnership, or a domestic corporation, if such labor or services are performed for an office or place of business maintained in a foreign country or in a possession of the United States by such individual, partnership, or corporation.

In addition, compensation for labor or services performed in the United States shall not be deemed to be income from sources within the United States if the labor or services are performed by a nonresident alien individual in connection with the individual’s temporary presence in the United States as a regular member of the crew of a foreign vessel engaged in transportation between the United States and a foreign country or a possession of the United States.

(4)Rentals and royalties

Rentals or royalties from property located in the United States or from any interest in such property, including rentals or royalties for the use of or for the privilege of using in the United States patents, copyrights, secret processes and formulas, good will, trade-marks, trade brands, franchises, and other like property.

(5)Disposition of United States real property interest

Gains, profits, and income from the disposition of a United States real property interest (as defined in section 897(c)).

(6)Sale or exchange of inventory property

Gains, profits, and income derived from the purchase of inventory property (within the meaning of section 865(i)(1)) without the United States (other than within a possession of the United States) and its sale or exchange within the United States.

(7)

Amounts received as underwriting income (as defined in section 832(b)(3)) derived from the issuing (or reinsuring) of any insurance or annuity contract—

(A)

in connection with property in, liability arising out of an activity in, or in connection with the lives or health of residents of, the United States, or

(B)

in connection with risks not described in subparagraph (A) as a result of any arrangement whereby another corporation receives a substantially equal amount of premiums or other consideration in respect to issuing (or reinsuring) any insurance or annuity contract in connection with property in, liability arising out of activity in, or in connection with the lives or health of residents of, the United States.

(8)Social security benefits

Any social security benefit (as defined in section 86(d)).

(9)Guarantees

Amounts received, directly or indirectly, from—

(A)

a noncorporate resident or domestic corporation for the provision of a guarantee of any indebtedness of such resident or corporation, or

(B)

any foreign person for the provision of a guarantee of any indebtedness of such person, if such amount is connected with income which is effectively connected (or treated as effectively connected) with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States.

(b)Taxable income from sources within United States

From the items of gross income specified in subsection (a) as being income from sources within the United States there shall be deducted the expenses, losses, and other deductions properly apportioned or allocated thereto and a ratable part of any expenses, losses, or other deductions which cannot definitely be allocated to some item or class of gross income. The remainder, if any, shall be included in full as taxable income from sources within the United States. In the case of an individual who does not itemize deductions, an amount equal to the standard deduction shall be considered a deduction which cannot definitely be allocated to some item or class of gross income.

(c)Special rule for application of subsection (a)(2)(B)

For purposes of subsection (a)(2)(B), if the foreign corporation has no gross income from any source for the 3-year period (or part thereof) specified, the requirements of such subsection shall be applied with respect to the taxable year of such corporation in which the payment of the dividend is made.

(d)Income from certain railroad rolling stock treated as income from sources within the United States
(1)General rule

For purposes of subsection (a) and section 862(a), if—

(A)

a taxpayer leases railroad rolling stock which is section 1245 property (as defined in section 1245(a)(3)) to a domestic common carrier by railroad or a corporation which is controlled, directly or indirectly, by one or more such common carriers, and

(B)

the use under such lease is expected to be use within the United States,

all amounts includible in gross income by the taxpayer with respect to such railroad rolling stock (including gain from sale or other disposition of such railroad rolling stock) shall be treated as income from sources within the United States. The requirements of subparagraph (B) of the preceding sentence shall be treated as satisfied if the only expected use outside the United States is use by a person (whether or not a United States person) in Canada or Mexico on a temporary basis which is not expected to exceed a total of 90 days in any taxable year.

(2)Paragraph (1) not to apply where lessor is a member of controlled group which includes a railroad

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a lease between two members of the same controlled group of corporations (as defined in section 1563) if any member of such group is a domestic common carrier by railroad or a switching or terminal company all of whose stock is owned by one or more domestic common carriers by railroad.

(3)Denial of foreign tax credit

No credit shall be allowed under section 901 for any payments to foreign countries with respect to any amount received by the taxpayer with respect to railroad rolling stock which is subject to paragraph (1).

(e)Cross reference

For treatment of interest paid by the branch of a foreign corporation, see section 884(f).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-1Income from sources within the United States Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) Categories of income. Part I (section 861 and following), subchapter N, chapter 1 of the Code, and the regulations thereunder determine the sources of income for purposes of the income tax. These sections explicitly allocate certain important sources of income to the United States or to areas outside the United States, as the case may be; and, with respect to the remaining income (particularly that derived partly from sources within and partly from sources without the United States), authorize the Secretary or his delegate to determine the income derived from sources within the United States, either by rules of separate allocation or by processes or formulas of general apportionment. The statute provides for the following three categories of income:

    (1) Within the United States. The gross income from sources within the United States, consisting of the items of gross income specified in section 861(a) plus the items of gross income allocated or apportioned to such sources in accordance with section 863(a). See §§ 1.861-2 to 1.861-7, inclusive, and § 1.863-1. The taxable income from sources within the United States, in the case of such income, shall be determined by deducting therefrom, in accordance with sections 861(b) and 863(a), the expenses, losses, and other deductions properly apportioned or allocated thereto and a ratable part of any other expenses, losses, or deductions which cannot definitely be allocated to some item or class of gross income. See §§ 1.861-8 and 1.863-1.

    (2) Without the United States. The gross income from sources without the United States, consisting of the items of gross income specified in section 862(a) plus the items of gross income allocated or apportioned to such sources in accordance with section 863(a). See §§ 1.862-1 and 1.863-1. The taxable income from sources without the United States, in the case of such income, shall be determined by deducting therefrom, in accordance with sections 862(b) and 863(a), the expenses, losses, and other deductions properly apportioned or allocated thereto and a ratable part of any other expenses, losses, or deductions which cannot definitely be allocated to some item or class of gross income. See §§ 1.862-1 and 1.863-1.

    (3) Partly within and partly without the United States. The gross income derived from sources partly within and partly without the United States, consisting of the items specified in section 863(b)(1), (2), and (3). The taxable income allocated or apportioned to sources within the United States, in the case of such income, shall be determined in accordance with section 863 (a) or (b). See §§ 1.863-2 to 1.863-5, inclusive.

    (4) Exceptions. An owner of certain aircraft or vessels first leased on or before December 28, 1980, may elect to treat income in respect of these aircraft or vessels as income from sources within the United States for purposes of sections 861(a) and 862(a). See § 1.861-9. An owner of certain aircraft, vessels, or spacecraft first leased after December 28, 1980, must treat income in respect of these craft as income from sources within the United States for purposes of sections 861(a) and 862(a). See § 1.861-9A.

    (b) Taxable income from sources within the United States. The taxable income from sources within the United States shall consist of the taxable income described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section plus the taxable income allocated or apportioned to such sources, as indicated in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.

    (c) Computation of income. If a taxpayer has gross income from sources within or without the United States, together with gross income derived partly from sources within and partly from sources without the United States, the amounts thereof, together with the expenses and investment applicable thereto, shall be segregated; and the taxable income from sources within the United States shall be separately computed therefrom.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-1(a)Categories of income. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Categories of income. Part I (section 861 and following), subchapter N, chapter 1 of the Code, and the regulations thereunder determine the sources of income for purposes of the income tax. These sections explicitly allocate certain important sources of income to the United States or to areas outside the United States, as the case may be; and, with respect to the remaining income (particularly that derived partly from sources within and partly from sources without the United States), authorize the Secretary or his delegate to determine the income derived from sources within the United States, either by rules of separate allocation or by processes or formulas of general apportionment. The statute provides for the following three categories of income:

    (1) Within the United States. The gross income from sources within the United States, consisting of the items of gross income specified in section 861(a) plus the items of gross income allocated or apportioned to such sources in accordance with section 863(a). See §§ 1.861-2 to 1.861-7, inclusive, and § 1.863-1. The taxable income from sources within the United States, in the case of such income, shall be determined by deducting therefrom, in accordance with sections 861(b) and 863(a), the expenses, losses, and other deductions properly apportioned or allocated thereto and a ratable part of any other expenses, losses, or deductions which cannot definitely be allocated to some item or class of gross income. See §§ 1.861-8 and 1.863-1.

    (2) Without the United States. The gross income from sources without the United States, consisting of the items of gross income specified in section 862(a) plus the items of gross income allocated or apportioned to such sources in accordance with section 863(a). See §§ 1.862-1 and 1.863-1. The taxable income from sources without the United States, in the case of such income, shall be determined by deducting therefrom, in accordance with sections 862(b) and 863(a), the expenses, losses, and other deductions properly apportioned or allocated thereto and a ratable part of any other expenses, losses, or deductions which cannot definitely be allocated to some item or class of gross income. See §§ 1.862-1 and 1.863-1.

    (3) Partly within and partly without the United States. The gross income derived from sources partly within and partly without the United States, consisting of the items specified in section 863(b)(1), (2), and (3). The taxable income allocated or apportioned to sources within the United States, in the case of such income, shall be determined in accordance with section 863 (a) or (b). See §§ 1.863-2 to 1.863-5, inclusive.

    (4) Exceptions. An owner of certain aircraft or vessels first leased on or before December 28, 1980, may elect to treat income in respect of these aircraft or vessels as income from sources within the United States for purposes of sections 861(a) and 862(a). See § 1.861-9. An owner of certain aircraft, vessels, or spacecraft first leased after December 28, 1980, must treat income in respect of these craft as income from sources within the United States for purposes of sections 861(a) and 862(a). See § 1.861-9A.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-1(b)Taxable income from sources within the United States. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Taxable income from sources within the United States. The taxable income from sources within the United States shall consist of the taxable income described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section plus the taxable income allocated or apportioned to such sources, as indicated in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-1(c)Computation of income. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Computation of income. If a taxpayer has gross income from sources within or without the United States, together with gross income derived partly from sources within and partly from sources without the United States, the amounts thereof, together with the expenses and investment applicable thereto, shall be segregated; and the taxable income from sources within the United States shall be separately computed therefrom.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10Special allocations of interest expense Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) In general. This section applies to all taxpayers and provides exceptions to the rules of § 1.861-9 that require the allocation and apportionment of interest expense based on all assets of all members of the affiliated group. Section 1.861-10T(b) provides rules for the direct allocation of interest expense to the income generated by certain assets that are subject to qualified nonrecourse indebtedness. Section 1.861-10T(c) provides rules for the direct allocation of interest expense to income generated by certain assets that are acquired in an integrated financial transaction. Section 1.861-10T(d) provides special rules that apply to all transactions described in § 1.861-10T(b) and (c). Paragraph (e) of this section requires the direct allocation of third-party interest expense of an affiliated group to such group's investments in related controlled foreign corporations in cases involving excess related person indebtedness (as defined therein). See also § 1.861-9T(b)(5), which requires the direct allocation of amortizable bond premium. Paragraph (f) of this section provides a special rule for certain regulated utility companies. Paragraph (g) of this section is reserved. Paragraph (h) of this section sets forth applicability dates.

    (b)-(d) [Reserved]

    (e) Treatment of certain related group indebtedness—(1) In general. If, for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 1991, a U.S. shareholder (as defined in paragraph (e)(5)(i) of this section) has both—

    (i) Excess related group indebtedness (as determined under Step One in paragraph (e)(2) of this section) and

    (ii) Excess U.S. shareholder indebtedness (as determined under Step Two in paragraph (e)(3) of this section), the U.S. shareholder shall allocate, to its gross income in the various separate limitation categories described in section 904(d)(1), a portion of its interest expense paid or accrued to any obligee who is not a member of the affiliated group (as defined in § 1.861-11T(d)) of the U.S. shareholder (“third party interest expense”), excluding amounts allocated under paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 1.861-10T. The amount of third party interest expense so allocated shall equal the total amount of interest income derived by the U.S. shareholder during the year from related group indebtedness, multiplied by the ratio of the lesser of the foregoing two amounts of excess indebtedness for the year to related group indebtedness for the year. This amount of third party interest expense is allocated as described in Step Three in paragraph (e)(4) of this section.

    (2) Step One: Excess related group indebtedness. (i) The excess related group indebtedness of a U.S. shareholder for the year equals the amount by which its related group indebtedness for the year exceeds its allowable related group indebtedness for the year.

    (ii) The “related group indebtedness” of the U.S. shareholder is the average of the aggregate amounts at the beginning and end of the year of indebtedness owed to the U.S. shareholder by each controlled foreign corporation which is a related person (as defined in paragraph (e)(5)(ii) of this section) with respect to the U.S. shareholder.

    (iii) The “allowable related group indebtedness” of a U.S. shareholder for the year equals—

    (A) The average of the aggregate values at the beginning and end of the year of the assets (including stock holdings in and obligations of related persons, other than related controlled foreign corporations) of each related controlled foreign corporation, multiplied by

    (B) The foreign base period ratio of the U.S. shareholder for the year.

    (iv) The “foreign base period ratio” of the U.S. shareholder for the year is the average of the related group debt-to-asset ratios of the U.S. shareholder for each taxable year comprising the foreign base period for the current year (each a “base year”). For this purpose, however, the related group debt-to-asset ratio of the U.S. shareholder for any base year may not exceed 110 percent of the foreign base period ratio for that base year. This limitation shall not apply with respect to any of the five taxable years chosen as initial base years by the U.S. shareholder under paragraph (e)(2)(v) of this section or with respect to any base year for which the related group debt-to-asset ratio does not exceed 0.10.

    (v)(A) The foreign base period for any current taxable year (except as described in paragraphs (e)(2)(v) (B) and (C) of this section) shall consist of the five taxable years immediately preceding the current year.

    (B) The U.S. shareholder may choose as foreign base periods for all of its first five taxable years for which this paragraph (e) is effective the following alternative base periods:

    (1) For the first effective taxable year, the 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985 and 1986 taxable years;

    (2) For the second effective taxable year, the 1983, 1984, 1985 and 1986 taxable years and the first effective taxable year;

    (3) For the third effective taxable year, the 1984, 1985 and 1986 taxable years and the first and second effective taxable years;

    (4) For the fourth effective taxable year, the 1985 and 1986 taxable years and the first, second and third effective taxable years; and

    (5) For the fifth effective taxable year, the 1986 taxable year and the first, second, third and fourth effective taxable years.

    (C) If, however, the U.S. shareholder does not choose, under paragraph (e)(10)(ii) of this section, to apply this paragraph (e) to one or more taxable years beginning before January 1, 1992, the U.S. shareholder may not include within any foreign base period the taxable year immediately preceding the first effective taxable year. Thus, for example, a U.S. shareholder for which the first effective taxable year is the taxable year beginning on October 1, 1992, may not include the taxable year beginning on October 1, 1991, in any foreign base period. Assuming that the U.S. shareholder does not elect the alternative base periods described in paragraph (e)(2)(v)(B) of this section, the initial foreign base period for the U.S. shareholder will consist of the taxable years beginning on October 1 of 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990. The foreign base period for the U.S. shareholder for the following taxable year, beginning on October 1, 1993, will consist of the taxable years beginning on October 1 of 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1992.

    (D) If the U.S. shareholder chooses the base periods described in paragraph (e)(2)(v)(B) of this section as foreign base periods, it must make a similar election under paragraph (e)(3)(v)(B) of this section with respect to its U.S. base periods.

    (vi) The “related group debt-to-asset ratio” of a U.S. shareholder for a year is the ratio between—

    (A) The related group indebtedness of the U.S. shareholder for the year (as determined under paragraph (e)(2)(ii) of this section); and

    (B) The average of the aggregate values at the beginning and end of the year of the assets (including stock holdings in and obligations of related persons, other than related controlled foreign corporations) of each related controlled foreign corporation.

    (vii) Notwithstanding paragraph (e)(2)(i) of this section, a U.S. shareholder is considered to have no excess related group indebtedness for the year if—

    (A) Its related group indebtedness for the year does not exceed its allowable related group indebtedness for the immediately preceding year (as determined under paragraph (e)(2)(iii) of this section); or

    (B) Its related group debt-to-asset ratio (as determined under paragraph (e)(2)(vi) of this section) for the year does not exceed 0.10.

    (3) Step Two: Excess U.S. shareholder indebtedness. (i) The excess indebtedness of a U.S. shareholder for the year equals the amount by which its unaffiliated indebtedness for the year exceeds its allowable indebtedness for the year.

    (ii) The “unaffiliated indebtedness” of the U.S. shareholder is the average of the aggregate amounts at the beginning and end of the year of indebtedness owed by the U.S. shareholder to any obligee, other than a member of the affiliated group (as defined in § 1.861-11T(d)) of the U.S shareholder.

    (iii) The “allowable indebtedness” of a U.S. shareholder for the year equals—

    (A) The average of the aggregate values at the beginning and end of the year of the assets of the U.S. shareholder (including stock holdings in and obligations of related controlled foreign corporations, but excluding stock holdings in and obligations of members of the affiliated group (as defined in § 1.861-11T(d)) of the U.S. shareholder), reduced by the amount of the excess related group indebtedness of the U.S. shareholder for the year (as determined under Step One in paragraph (e)(2) of this section), multiplied by

    (B) The U.S. base period ratio of the U.S. shareholder for the year.

    (iv) The “U.S. base period ratio” of the U.S. shareholder for the year is the average of the debt-to-asset ratios of the U.S. shareholder for each taxable year comprising the U.S. base period for the current year (each a “base year”). For this purpose, however, the debt-to-asset ratio of the U.S. shareholder for any base year may not exceed 110 percent of the U.S. base period ratio for that base year. This limitation shall not apply with respect to any of the five taxable years chosen as initial base years by the U.S. shareholder under paragraph (e)(3)(v) of this section or with respect to any base year for which of the debt-to-asset ratio does not exceed 0.10.

    (v)(A) The U.S. base period for any current taxable year (except as described in paragraphs (e)(3)(v) (B) and (C) of this section) shall consist of the five taxable years immediately preceding the current year.

    (B) The U.S. shareholder may choose as U.S. base periods for all of its first five taxable years for which this paragraph (e) is effective the following alternative base periods:

    (1) For the first effective taxable year, the 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985 and 1986 taxable years;

    (2) For the second effective taxable year, the 1983, 1984, 1985 and 1986 taxable years and the first effective taxable year;

    (3) For the third effective taxable year, the 1984, 1985 and 1986 taxable years and the first and second effective taxable years;

    (4) For the fourth effective taxable year, the 1985 and 1986 taxable years and the first, second and third effective taxable years; and

    (5) For the fifth effective taxable year, the 1986 taxable year and the first, second, third and fourth effective taxable years.

    (C) If, however, the U.S. shareholder does not choose, under paragraph (e)(10)(ii) of this section, to apply this paragraph (e) to one or more taxable years beginning before January 1, 1992, the U.S. shareholder may not include within any U.S. base period the taxable year immediately preceding the first effective taxable year. Thus, for example, a U.S. shareholder for which the first effective taxable year is the taxable year beginning on October 1, 1992, may not include the taxable year beginning on October 1, 1991, in any U.S. base period. Assuming that the U.S. shareholder does not elect the alternative base periods described in paragraph (e)(3)(v)(B) of this section, the initial U.S. base period for the U.S. shareholder will consist of the taxable years beginning on October 1, of 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990. The U.S. base period for the U.S. shareholder for the following taxable year, beginning on October 1, 1993, will consist of the taxable years beginning on October 1, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1992.

    (D) If the U.S. shareholder chooses the base periods described in paragraph (e)(3)(v)(B) of this section as U.S. base periods, it must make a similar election under paragraph (e)(2)(v)(B) of this section with respect to its foreign base periods.

    (vi) The “debt-to-asset ratio” of a U.S. shareholder for a year is the ratio between—

    (A) The unaffiliated indebtedness of the U.S. shareholder for the year (as determined under paragraph (e)(3)(ii) of this section); and

    (B) The average of the aggregate values at the beginning and end of the year of the assets of the U.S. shareholder. For this purpose, the assets of the U.S. shareholder include stock holdings in and obligations of related controlled foreign corporations but do not include stock holdings in and obligations of members of the affiliated group (as defined in § 1.861-11T(d)).

    (vii) A U.S. shareholder is considered to have no excess indebtedness for the year if its debt-to-asset ratio (as determined under paragraph (e)(3)(vi) of this section) for the year does not exceed 0.10.

    (4) Step Three: Allocation of third party interest expense. (i) A U.S. shareholder shall allocate to its gross income in the various separate limitation categories described in section 904(d)(1) a portion of its third party interest expense incurred during the year equal in amount to the interest income derived by the U.S. shareholder during the year from allocable related group indebtedness.

    (ii) The “allocable related group indebtedness” of a U.S. shareholder for any year is an amount of related group indebtedness equal to the lesser of—

    (A) The excess related group indebtedness of the U.S. shareholder for the year (determined under Step One in paragraph (e)(2) of this section); or

    (B) The excess U.S. shareholder indebtedness for the year (determined under Step Two in paragraph (e)(3) of this section).

    (iii) The amount of interest income derived by a U.S. shareholder from allocable related group indebtedness during the year equals the total amount of interest income derived by the U.S. shareholder during the year with respect to related group indebtedness, multiplied by the ratio of allocable related group indebtedness for the year to the aggregate amount of related group indebtedness for the year.

    (iv) The portion of third party interest expense described in paragraph (e)(4)(i) of this section shall be allocated in proportion to the relative average amounts of related group indebtedness held by the U.S. shareholder in each separate limitation category during the year. The remaining portion of third party interest expense of the U.S. shareholder for the year shall be apportioned as provided in §§ 1.861-8T through 1.861-13T, excluding paragraph (e) of § 1.861-10T and this paragraph (e).

    (v) The average amount of related group indebtedness held by the U.S. shareholder in each separate limitation category during the year equals the average of the aggregate amounts of such indebtedness in each separate limitation category at the beginning and end of the year. Solely for purposes of this paragraph (e)(4), each debt obligation of a related controlled foreign corporation held by the U.S. shareholder at the beginning or end of the year is attributed to separate limitation categories in the same manner as the stock of the obligor would be attributed under the rules of § 1.861-12T(c)(3), whether or not such stock is held directly by the U.S. shareholder.

    (vi) The amount of third party interest expense of a U.S. shareholder allocated pursuant to this paragraph (e)(4) shall not exceed the total amount of the third party interest expense of the U.S. shareholder for the year (excluding any third party interest expense allocated under paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 1.861-10T).

    (5) Definitions. For purposes of this paragraph (e), the following terms shall have the following meanings.

    (i) U.S. shareholder. The term “U.S. shareholder” has the same meaning as the term “United States shareholder” when used in section 957, except that, in the case of a United States shareholder that is a member of an affiliated group (as defined in § 1.861-11T(d)), the entire affiliated group is considered to constitute a single U.S. shareholder.

    (ii) Related person. For the definition of the term “related person”, see § 1.861-8T(c)(2). A controlled foreign corporation is considered “related” to a U.S. shareholder if it is a related person with respect to the U.S. shareholder.

    (6) Determination of asset values. A U.S. shareholder shall determine the values of the assets of each related controlled foreign corporation (for purposes of Step One in paragraph (e)(2) of this section) and the assets of the U.S. shareholder (for purposes of Step Two in paragraph (e)(3) of this section) for any year in accordance with the valuation method (tax book value or fair market value) elected for that year pursuant to § 1.861-9T(g). However, solely for purposes of this paragraph (e), a U.S. shareholder may instead choose to determine the values of the assets of all related controlled foreign corporations by reference to their values as reflected on Forms 5471 (the annual information return with respect to each related controlled foreign corporation), subject to the translation rules of paragraph (e)(8)(i) of this section. This method of valuation may be used only if the taxable years of each of the related controlled foreign corporations begin with, or no more than one month earlier than, the taxable year of the U.S. shareholder. Once chosen for a taxable year, this method of valuation must be used in each subsequent taxable year and may be changed only with the consent of the Commissioner.

    (7) Adjustments to asset value. For purposes of apportioning remaining interest expense under § 1.861-9T, a U.S. shareholder shall reduce (but not below zero) the value of its assets for the year (as determined under § 1.861-9T (g) (3) or (h)) by an amount equal to the allocable related group indebtedness of the U.S. shareholder for the year (as determined under Step Three in paragraph (e)(4)(ii) of this section). This reduction is allocated among assets in each separate limitation category in proportion to the average amount of related group indebtedness held by the U.S. shareholder in each separate limitation category during the year (as determined under Step Three in paragraph (e)(4)(v) of this section).

    (8) Special rules—(i) Exchange rates. All indebtedness amounts and asset values (including current year and base year amounts and values) denominated in a foreign currency shall be translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate for the current year. The exchange rate for the current year may be determined under any reasonable method (e.g., average of month-end exchange rates for each month in the current year) if it is consistently applied to the current year and all base years. Once chosen for a taxable year, a method for determining an exchange rate must be used in each subsequent taxable year and will be treated as a method of accounting for purposes of section 446. A taxpayer may apply a different translation rule only with the prior consent of the Commissioner. In this regard, the Commissioner will be guided by the extent to which a different rule would reduce the comparability of dollar amounts of indebtedness and dollar asset values for the base years and the current year.

    (ii) Exempt assets. Solely for purposes of this paragraph (e), any exempt assets otherwise excluded under section 864(e)(3) and § 1.861-8T(d) shall be included as assets of the U.S. shareholder or related controlled foreign corporation.

    (iii) Exclusion of certain directly allocated indebtedness and assets. Qualified nonrecourse indebtedness (as defined in § 1.861-10T(b)(2)) and indebtedness incurred in connection with an integrated financial transaction (as defined in § 1.861-10T(c)(2)) shall be excluded from U.S. shareholder indebtedness and related group indebtedness. In addition, assets which are the subject of qualified nonrecourse indebtedness or integrated financial transactions shall be excluded from the assets of the U.S. shareholder and each related controlled foreign corporation.

    (iv) Exclusion of certain receivables. Receivables between related controlled foreign corporations (or between members of the affiliated group constituting the U.S. shareholder) shall be excluded from the assets of the related controlled foreign corporation (or affiliated group member) holding such receivables. See also § 1.861-11T(e)(1).

    (v) Classification of loans between controlled foreign corporations. In determining the amount of related group indebtedness for any taxable year, loans outstanding from one controlled foreign corporation to a related controlled foreign corporation are not treated as related group indebtedness. For purposes of determining the foreign base period ratio under paragraph (e)(2)(iv) of this section for a taxable year that ends on or after November 2, 2020, the rules of this paragraph (e)(8)(v) apply to determine the related group debt-to-asset ratio in each taxable year included in the foreign base period, including in taxable years that end before November 2, 2020.

    (vi) Classification of hybrid stock. In determining the amount of its related group indebtedness for any taxable year, a U.S. shareholder must not treat stock in a related controlled foreign corporation as related group indebtedness, regardless of whether the related controlled foreign corporation claims a deduction for interest under foreign law for distributions on such stock. For purposes of determining the foreign base period ratio under paragraph (e)(2)(iv) of this section for a taxable year that ends on or after December 4, 2018, the rules of this paragraph (e)(8)(vi) apply to determine the related group debt-to-asset ratio in each taxable year included in the foreign base period, including in taxable years that end before December 4, 2018.

    (9) Corporate events—(i) Initial acquisition of a controlled foreign corporation. If the foreign base period of the U.S. shareholder for any year includes a base year in which the U.S. shareholder did not hold stock in any related controlled foreign corporation, then, in computing the foreign base period ratio, the related group debt-to-asset ratio of the U.S. shareholder for any such base year shall be deemed to be 0.10.

    (ii) Incorporation of U.S. shareholder—(A) Nonapplication. This paragraph (e) does not apply to the first taxable year of the U.S. shareholder. However, this paragraph (e) does apply to all following years, including years in which later members of the affiliated group may be incorporated.

    (B) Foreign and U.S. base period ratios. In computing the foreign and U.S. base period ratios, the foreign and U.S. base periods of the U.S. shareholder shall be considered to be only the period prior to the current year that the U.S. shareholder was in existence if this prior period is less than five taxable years.

    (iii) Acquisition of additional corporations. (A) If a U.S. shareholder acquires (directly or indirectly) stock of a foreign or domestic corporation which, by reason of the acquisition, then becomes a related controlled foreign corporation or a member of the affiliated group, then in determining excess related group indebtedness or excess U.S. shareholder indebtedness, the indebtedness and assets of the acquired corporation shall be taken into account only at the end of the acquisition year and in following years. Thus, amounts of indebtedness and assets and the various debt-to-asset ratios of the U.S. shareholder existing at the beginning of the acquisition year or relating to preceding years are not recalculated to take account of indebtedness and assets of the acquired corporation existing as of dates before the end of the year. If, however, a major acquisition is made within the last three months of the year and a substantial distortion of values for the year would otherwise result, the taxpaper must take into account the average values of the acquired indebtedness and assets weighted to reflect the time such indebtedness is owed and such assets are held by the taxpayer during the year.

    (B) In the case of a reverse acquisition subject to this paragraph (e)(9), the rules of § 1.1502-75(d)(3) apply in determining which corporations are the acquiring and acquired corporations. For this purpose, whether corporations are affiliated is determined under § 1.861-11T(d).

    (C) If the stock of a U.S. shareholder is acquired by (and, by reason of such acquisition, the U.S. shareholder becomes affiliated with) a corporation described below, then such U.S. shareholder shall be considered to have acquired such corporation for purposes of the application of the rules of this paragraph (e). A corporation to which this paragraph (e)(9)(iii)(C) applies is—

    (1) A corporation which is not affiliated with any other corporation (other than other similarly described corporation); and

    (2) Substantially all of the assets of which consist of cash, securities and stock.

    (iv) Election to compute base period ratios by including acquired corporations. A U.S. shareholder may choose, solely for purposes of paragraph (e)(9) (i) and (iii) of this section, to compute its foreign and U.S. base period ratios for the acquisition year and all subsequent years by taking into account the indebtedness and asset values of the acquired corporation or corporations (including related group indebtedness owed to a former U.S. shareholder) at the beginning of the acquisition year and in each of the five base years preceding the acquisition year. This election, if made for an acquisition, must be made for all other acquisitions occurring during the same taxable year or initiated in that year and concluded in the following year.

    (v) Dispositions. If a U.S. shareholder disposes of stock of a foreign or domestic corporation which, by reason of the disposition, then ceases to be a related controlled foreign corporation or a member of the affiliated group (unless liquidated or merged into a related corporation), in determining excess related group indebtedness or excess U.S. shareholder indebtedness, the indebtedness and assets of the divested corporation shall be taken into account only at the beginning of the disposition year and for the relevant preceding years. Thus, amounts of indebtedness and assets and the various debt-to-asset ratios of the U.S. shareholder existing at the end of the year or relating to following years are not affected by indebtedness and assets of the divested corporation existing as of dates after the beginning of the year. If, however, a major disposition is made within the first three months of the year and a substantial distortion of values for the year would otherwise result, the taxpayer must take into account the average values of the divested indebtedness and assets weighted to reflect the time such indebtedness is owed and such assets are held by the taxpayer during the year.

    (vi) Election to compute base period ratios by excluding divested corporations. A U.S. shareholder may choose, solely for purposes of paragraph (e) (9) (v) and (vii) of this section, to compute its foreign and U.S. base period ratios for the disposition year and all subsequent years without taking into account the indebtedness and asset values of the divested corporation or corporations at the beginning of the disposition year and in each of the five base years preceding the disposition year. This election, if made for a disposition, must be made for all other dispositions occurring during the same taxable year or initiated in that year and concluded in the following year.

    (vii) Section 355 transactions. A U.S. corporation which becomes a separate U.S. shareholder as a result of a distribution of its stock to which section 355 applies shall be considered—

    (A) As disposed of by the U.S. shareholder of the affiliated group of which the distributing corporation is a member, with this disposition subject to the rules of paragraphs (e) (9) (v) and (vi) of this section; and

    (B) As having the same related group debt-to-asset ratio and debt-to-asset ratio as the distributing U.S. shareholder in each year preceding the year of distribution for purposes of applying this paragraph (e) to the year of distribution and subsequent years of the distributed corporation.

    (10) [Reserved]

    (11) The following example illustrates the provisions of this paragraph (e):

    (f) Indebtedness of certain regulated utilities. If an automatically excepted regulated utility trade or business (as defined in § 1.163(j)-1(b)(15)(i)(A)) has qualified nonrecourse indebtedness within the meaning of the second sentence in § 1.163(j)-10(d)(2), interest expense from the indebtedness is directly allocated to the taxpayer's assets in the manner and to the extent provided in § 1.861-10T(b).

    (g) [Reserved]

    (h) Applicability dates. Except as provided in this paragraph (h), this section applies to taxable years ending on or after December 4, 2018. Paragraph (e)(8)(v) of this section applies to taxable years ending on or after November 2, 2020, and paragraph (f) of this section applies to taxable years beginning on or after December 28, 2021.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10(a)In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    In general. This section applies to all taxpayers and provides exceptions to the rules of § 1.861-9 that require the allocation and apportionment of interest expense based on all assets of all members of the affiliated group. Section 1.861-10T(b) provides rules for the direct allocation of interest expense to the income generated by certain assets that are subject to qualified nonrecourse indebtedness. Section 1.861-10T(c) provides rules for the direct allocation of interest expense to income generated by certain assets that are acquired in an integrated financial transaction. Section 1.861-10T(d) provides special rules that apply to all transactions described in § 1.861-10T(b) and (c). Paragraph (e) of this section requires the direct allocation of third-party interest expense of an affiliated group to such group's investments in related controlled foreign corporations in cases involving excess related person indebtedness (as defined therein). See also § 1.861-9T(b)(5), which requires the direct allocation of amortizable bond premium. Paragraph (f) of this section provides a special rule for certain regulated utility companies. Paragraph (g) of this section is reserved. Paragraph (h) of this section sets forth applicability dates.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10(b)§1.861-10(b) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    -(d) [Reserved]

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10(e)Treatment of certain related group indebtedness—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Treatment of certain related group indebtedness—(1) In general. If, for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 1991, a U.S. shareholder (as defined in paragraph (e)(5)(i) of this section) has both—

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10(f)Indebtedness of certain regulated utilities. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Indebtedness of certain regulated utilities. If an automatically excepted regulated utility trade or business (as defined in § 1.163(j)-1(b)(15)(i)(A)) has qualified nonrecourse indebtedness within the meaning of the second sentence in § 1.163(j)-10(d)(2), interest expense from the indebtedness is directly allocated to the taxpayer's assets in the manner and to the extent provided in § 1.861-10T(b).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10(g)§1.861-10(g) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    [Reserved]

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10(h)Applicability dates. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Applicability dates. Except as provided in this paragraph (h), this section applies to taxable years ending on or after December 4, 2018. Paragraph (e)(8)(v) of this section applies to taxable years ending on or after November 2, 2020, and paragraph (f) of this section applies to taxable years beginning on or after December 28, 2021.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10(i)U. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    U.S. shareholder. The term “U.S. shareholder” has the same meaning as the term “United States shareholder” when used in section 957, except that, in the case of a United States shareholder that is a member of an affiliated group (as defined in § 1.861-11T(d)), the entire affiliated group is considered to constitute a single U.S. shareholder.

    (ii) Related person. For the definition of the term “related person”, see § 1.861-8T(c)(2). A controlled foreign corporation is considered “related” to a U.S. shareholder if it is a related person with respect to the U.S. shareholder.

    (6) Determination of asset values. A U.S. shareholder shall determine the values of the assets of each related controlled foreign corporation (for purposes of Step One in paragraph (e)(2) of this section) and the assets of the U.S. shareholder (for purposes of Step Two in paragraph (e)(3) of this section) for any year in accordance with the valuation method (tax book value or fair market value) elected for that year pursuant to § 1.861-9T(g). However, solely for purposes of this paragraph (e), a U.S. shareholder may instead choose to determine the values of the assets of all related controlled foreign corporations by reference to their values as reflected on Forms 5471 (the annual information return with respect to each related controlled foreign corporation), subject to the translation rules of paragraph (e)(8)(i) of this section. This method of valuation may be used only if the taxable years of each of the related controlled foreign corporations begin with, or no more than one month earlier than, the taxable year of the U.S. shareholder. Once chosen for a taxable year, this method of valuation must be used in each subsequent taxable year and may be changed only with the consent of the Commissioner.

    (7) Adjustments to asset value. For purposes of apportioning remaining interest expense under § 1.861-9T, a U.S. shareholder shall reduce (but not below zero) the value of its assets for the year (as determined under § 1.861-9T (g) (3) or (h)) by an amount equal to the allocable related group indebtedness of the U.S. shareholder for the year (as determined under Step Three in paragraph (e)(4)(ii) of this section). This reduction is allocated among assets in each separate limitation category in proportion to the average amount of related group indebtedness held by the U.S. shareholder in each separate limitation category during the year (as determined under Step Three in paragraph (e)(4)(v) of this section).

    (8) Special rules—(i) Exchange rates. All indebtedness amounts and asset values (including current year and base year amounts and values) denominated in a foreign currency shall be translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate for the current year. The exchange rate for the current year may be determined under any reasonable method (e.g., average of month-end exchange rates for each month in the current year) if it is consistently applied to the current year and all base years. Once chosen for a taxable year, a method for determining an exchange rate must be used in each subsequent taxable year and will be treated as a method of accounting for purposes of section 446. A taxpayer may apply a different translation rule only with the prior consent of the Commissioner. In this regard, the Commissioner will be guided by the extent to which a different rule would reduce the comparability of dollar amounts of indebtedness and dollar asset values for the base years and the current year.

    (ii) Exempt assets. Solely for purposes of this paragraph (e), any exempt assets otherwise excluded under section 864(e)(3) and § 1.861-8T(d) shall be included as assets of the U.S. shareholder or related controlled foreign corporation.

    (iii) Exclusion of certain directly allocated indebtedness and assets. Qualified nonrecourse indebtedness (as defined in § 1.861-10T(b)(2)) and indebtedness incurred in connection with an integrated financial transaction (as defined in § 1.861-10T(c)(2)) shall be excluded from U.S. shareholder indebtedness and related group indebtedness. In addition, assets which are the subject of qualified nonrecourse indebtedness or integrated financial transactions shall be excluded from the assets of the U.S. shareholder and each related controlled foreign corporation.

    (iv) Exclusion of certain receivables. Receivables between related controlled foreign corporations (or between members of the affiliated group constituting the U.S. shareholder) shall be excluded from the assets of the related controlled foreign corporation (or affiliated group member) holding such receivables. See also § 1.861-11T(e)(1).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10(v)Dispositions. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Dispositions. If a U.S. shareholder disposes of stock of a foreign or domestic corporation which, by reason of the disposition, then ceases to be a related controlled foreign corporation or a member of the affiliated group (unless liquidated or merged into a related corporation), in determining excess related group indebtedness or excess U.S. shareholder indebtedness, the indebtedness and assets of the divested corporation shall be taken into account only at the beginning of the disposition year and for the relevant preceding years. Thus, amounts of indebtedness and assets and the various debt-to-asset ratios of the U.S. shareholder existing at the end of the year or relating to following years are not affected by indebtedness and assets of the divested corporation existing as of dates after the beginning of the year. If, however, a major disposition is made within the first three months of the year and a substantial distortion of values for the year would otherwise result, the taxpayer must take into account the average values of the divested indebtedness and assets weighted to reflect the time such indebtedness is owed and such assets are held by the taxpayer during the year.

    (vi) Election to compute base period ratios by excluding divested corporations. A U.S. shareholder may choose, solely for purposes of paragraph (e) (9) (v) and (vii) of this section, to compute its foreign and U.S. base period ratios for the disposition year and all subsequent years without taking into account the indebtedness and asset values of the divested corporation or corporations at the beginning of the disposition year and in each of the five base years preceding the disposition year. This election, if made for a disposition, must be made for all other dispositions occurring during the same taxable year or initiated in that year and concluded in the following year.

    (vii) Section 355 transactions. A U.S. corporation which becomes a separate U.S. shareholder as a result of a distribution of its stock to which section 355 applies shall be considered—

    (A) As disposed of by the U.S. shareholder of the affiliated group of which the distributing corporation is a member, with this disposition subject to the rules of paragraphs (e) (9) (v) and (vi) of this section; and

    (B) As having the same related group debt-to-asset ratio and debt-to-asset ratio as the distributing U.S. shareholder in each year preceding the year of distribution for purposes of applying this paragraph (e) to the year of distribution and subsequent years of the distributed corporation.

    (10) [Reserved]

    (11) The following example illustrates the provisions of this paragraph (e):

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10TSpecial allocations of interest expense Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) In general. This section applies to all taxpayers and provides three exceptions to the rules of § 1.861-9T that require the allocation and apportionment of interest expense on the basis of all assets of all members of the affiliated group. Paragraph (b) of this section describes the direct allocation of interest expense to the income generated by certain assets that are subject to qualified nonrecourse indebtedness. Paragraph (c) of this section describes the direct allocation of interest expense to income generated by certain assets that are acquired in integrated financial transaction. Paragraph (d) of this section provides special rules that are applicable to all transactions described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. Paragraph (e) of this section requires the direct allocation of third party interest of an affiliated group to such group's investment in related controlled foreign corporations in cases involving excess related person indebtedness (as defined therein). See also § 1.861-9T(b)(5), which requires direct allocation of amortizable bond premium.

    (b) Qualified nonrecourse indebtedness—(1) In general. In the case of qualified nonrecourse indebtedness (as defined in paragraph (b)(2) of this section), the deduction for interest shall be considered directly allocable solely to the gross income which the property acquired, constructed, or improved with the proceeds of the indebtedness generates, has generated, or could reasonably be expected to generate.

    (2) Qualified nonrecourse indebtedness defined. The term “qualified nonrecourse indebtedness” means any borrowing that is not excluded by paragraph (b)(4) of this section if:

    (i) The borrowing is specifically incurred for the purpose of purchasing, constructing, or improving identified property that is either depreciable tangible personal property or real property with a useful life of more than one year or for the purpose of purchasing amortizable intangible personal property with a useful life of more than one year;

    (ii) The proceeds are actually applied to purchase, construct, or improve the identified property;

    (iii) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(7)(ii) (relating to certain third party guarantees in leveraged lease transactions), the creditor can look only to the identified property (or any lease or other interest therein) as security for payment of the principal and interest on the loan and, thus, cannot look to any other property, the borrower, or any third party with respect to repayment of principal or interest on the loan;

    (iv) The cash flow from the property, as defined in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, is reasonably expected to be sufficient in the first year of ownership as well as in each subsequent year of ownership to fulfill the terms and conditions of the loan agreement with respect to the amount and timing of payments of interest and original issue discount and periodic payments of principal in each such year; and

    (v) There are restrictions in the loan agreement on the disposal or use of the property consistent with the assumptions described in subdivisions (iii) and (iv) of this paragraph (b)(2).

    (3) Cash flow defined—(i) In general. The term “cash flow from the property” as used in paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section means a stream of revenue (as computed under paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section) substantially all of which derives directly from the property. The phrase “cash flow from the property” does not include revenue if a significant portion thereof is derived from activities such as sales, labor, services, or the use of other property. Thus, revenue derived from the sale or lease of inventory or of similar property does not constitute cash flow from the property, including plant or equipment used in the manufacture and sale or lease, or purchase and sale or lease, of such inventory or similar property. In addition, revenue derived in part from the performance of services that are not ancillary and subsidiary to the use of property does not constitute cash flow from the property.

    (ii) Self-constructed assets. The activities associated with self-construction of assets shall be considered to constitute labor or services for purposes of paragraph (b)(3)(i) only if the self-constructed asset—

    (A) Is constructed for the purpose of resale, or

    (B) Without regard to purpose, is sold to an unrelated person within one year from the date that the property is placed in service for purposes of section 167.

    (iii) Computation of cash flow. Cash flow is computed by subtracting cash disbursements excluding debt service from cash receipts.

    (iv) Analysis of operating costs. [Reserved]

    (v) Examples. The principles of this paragraph may be demonstrated by the following examples.

    (4) Exclusions. The term “qualified nonrecourse indebtedness” shall not include any transaction that—

    (i) Lacks economic significance within the meaning of paragraph (b)(5) of this section;

    (ii) Involves cross collateralization within the meaning of paragraph (b)(6) of this section;

    (iii) Except in the case of a leveraged lease described in paragraph (b)(7)(ii) of this section, involves credit enhancement within the meaning of paragraph (b)(7) of this section or, with respect to loans made on or after October 14, 1988, does not under the terms of the loan documents, prohibit the acquisition by the holder of bond insurance or similar forms of credit enhancement;

    (iv) Involves the purchase of inventory;

    (v) Involves the purchase of any financial asset, including stock in a corporation, an interest in a partnership or a trust, or the debt obligation of any obligor (although interest incurred in order to purchase certain financial instruments may qualify for direct allocation under paragraph (c) of this section);

    (vi) Involves interest expense that constitutes qualified residence interest as defined in section 163(h)(3); or

    (vii) [Reserved]

    (5) Economic significance. Indebtedness that otherwise qualifies under paragraph (b)(2) shall nonetheless be subject to apportionment under § 1.861-9T if, taking into account all the facts and circumstances, the transaction (including the security arrangement) lacks economic significance.

    (6) Cross collateralization. The term “cross collateralization” refers to the pledge as security for a loan of—

    (i) Any asset of the borrower other than the identified property described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, or

    (ii) Any asset belonging to any related person, as defined in § 1.861-8T(c)(2).

    (7) Credit enhancement—(i) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(7)(ii) of this section, the term “credit enhancement” refers to any device, including a contract, letter of credit, or guaranty, that expands the creditor's rights, directly or indirectly, beyond the identified property purchased, constructed, or improved with the funds advanced and, thus effectively provides as security for a loan the assets of any person other than the borrower. The acquisition of bond insurance or any other contract of suretyship by an initial or subsequent holder of an obligation shall constitute credit enhancement.

    (ii) Special rule for leveraged leases. For purposes of this paragraph (b), the term “credit enhancement” shall not include any device under which any person that is not a related person within the meaning of § 1.861-8T(c)(2) agrees to guarantee, without recourse to the lessor or any person related to the lessor, a lessor's payment of principal and interest on indebtedness that was incurred in order to purchase or improve an asset that is depreciable tangible personal property or depreciable tangible real property (and the land on which such real property is situated) that is leased to a lessee that is not a related person in a transaction that constitutes a lease for federal income tax purposes.

    (iii) Syndication of credit risk and sale of loan participations. The term “syndication of credit risk” refers to an arrangement in which one primary lender secures the promise of a secondary lender to bear a portion of the primary lender's credit risk on a loan. The term “sale of loan participations” refers to an arrangement in which one primary lender divides a loan into several portions, sells and assigns all rights with respect to one or more portions to participating secondary lenders, and does not remain at risk in any manner with respect to the portion assigned. For purposes of this paragraph (b), the syndication of credit risk shall constitute credit enhancement because the primary lender can look to secondary lenders for payment of the loan, notwithstanding limitations on the amount of the secondary lender's liability. Conversely, the sale of loan participations does not constitute credit enhancement, because the holder of each portion of the loan can look solely to the asset securing the loan and not to the credit or other assets of any person.

    (8) Other arrangements that do not constitute cross collateralization or credit enhancement. For purposes of paragraphs (b)(6) and (7) of this section, the following arrangements do not constitute cross collateralization or credit enhancement:

    (i) Integrated projects. A taxpayer's pledge of multiple assets of an integrated project, provided that the integrated project. An integrated project consists of functionally related and geographically contiguous assets that, as to the taxpayer, are used in the same trade or business.

    (ii) Insurance. A taxpayer's purchase of third-party casualty and liability insurance on the collateral or, by contract, bearing the risk of loss associated with destruction of the collateral or with respect to the attachment of third party liability claims.

    (iii) After-acquired property. Extension of a creditor's security interest to improvements made to the collateral, provided that the extension does not constitute excess collateralization under paragraph (b)(6), determined by taking into account the value of improvements at the time the improvements are made and the value of the original property at the time the loan was made.

    (iv) Warranties of completion and maintenance. A taxpayer's warranty to a creditor that it will complete construction or manufacture of the collateral or that it will maintain the collateral in good condition.

    (v) Substitution of collateral. A taxpayer's right to substitute collateral under any loan contract. However, after the right is exercised, the loan shall no longer constitute qualified nonrecourse indebtedness.

    (9) Refinancings. If a taxpayer refinances qualified nonrecourse indebtedness (as defined in paragraph (b)(2) of this section) with new indebtedness, such new indebtedness shall continue to qualify only if—

    (i) The principal amount of the new indebtedness does not exceed by more than five percent the remaining principal amount of the original indebtedness,

    (ii) The term of the new indebtedness does not exceed by more than six months the remaining term of the original indebtedness, and

    (iii) The requirements of this paragraph (other than those of paragraph (b)(2) (i) and (ii) of this section) are satisfied at the time of the refinancing, and the exclusions contained in this paragraph (b)(4) do not apply.

    (10) Post-construction permanent financing. Financing that is obtained after the completion of constructed property will be deemed to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(2) (i) and (ii) of this section if—

    (i) The financing is obtained within one year after the constructed property or substantially all of a constructed integrated project (as defined in paragraph (b)(9)(i) of this section) is placed in service for purposes of section 167; and

    (ii) The financing does not exceed the cost of construction (including construction period interest).

    (11) Assumptions of pre-existing qualified nonrecourse indebtedness. If a transferee of property that is subject to qualified nonrecourse indebtedness assumes such indebtedness, the indebtedness shall continue to constitute qualified nonrecourse indebtedness, provided that the assumption in no way alters the qualified status of the debt.

    (12) Excess collateralization. [Reserved]

    (c) Direct allocations in the case of certain integrated financial transactions—(1) General rule. Interest expense incurred on funds borrowed in connection with an integrated financial transaction (as defined in paragraph (c)(2) of this section) shall be directly allocated to the income generated by the investment funded with the borrowed amounts.

    (2) Definition. The term “integrated financial transaction” refers to any transaction in which—

    (i) The taxpayer—

    (A) Incurs indebtedness for the purpose of making an identified term investment,

    (B) Identifies the indebtedness as incurred for such purpose at the time the indebtedness is incurred, and

    (C) Makes the identified term investment within ten business days after incurring the indebtedness;

    (ii) The return on the investment is reasonably expected to be sufficient throughout the term of the investment to fulfill the terms and conditions of the loan agreement with respect to the amount and timing of payments of principal and interest or original issue discount;

    (iii) The income constitutes interest or original issue discount or would constitute income equivalent to interest if earned by a controlled foreign corporation (as described in § 1.954-2T(h));

    (iv) The debt incurred and the investment mature within ten business days of each other;

    (v) The investment does not relate in any way to the operation of, and is not made in the normal course of, the trade or business of the taxpayer or any related person, including the financing of the sale of goods or the performance of services by the taxpayer or any related person, or the compensation of the taxpayer's employees (including any contribution or loan to an employee stock ownership plan (as defined in section 4975(e)(7)) or other plan that is qualified under section 401(a)); and

    (vi) The borrower does not constitute a financial services entity (as defined in section 904 and the regulations thereunder).

    (3) Rollovers. In the event that a taxpayer sells of otherwise liquidates an investment described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the interest expense incurred on the borrowing shall, subsequent to that liquidation, no longer qualify for direct allocation under this paragraph (c).

    (4) Examples. The principles of this paragraph (c) may be demonstrated by the following examples.

    (d) Special rules. In applying paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the following special rules shall apply.

    (1) Related person transactions. The rules of this section shall not apply to the extent that any transaction—

    (i) Involves either indebtedness between related persons (as defined in section § 1.861-8T(c)(2)) or indebtedness incurred from unrelated persons for the purpose of purchasing property from a related person; or

    (ii) Involves the purchase of property that is leased to a related person (as defined in § 1.861-8T(c)(2)) in a transaction described in paragraph (b) of this section. If a taxpayer purchases property and leases such property in whole or in part to a related person, a portion of the interest incurred in connection with such an acquisition, based on the ratio that the value of the property leased to the related person bears to the total value of the property, shall not qualify for direct allocation under this section.

    (2) Consideration of assets or income to which interest is directly allocated in apportioning other interest expense. In apportioning interest expense under § 1.861-9T, the year-end value of any asset to which interest expense is directly allocated under this section during the current taxable year shall be reduced to the extent provided in § 1.861-9T(g)(2)(iii) to reflect the portion of the principal amount of the indebtedness outstanding at year-end relating to the interest which is directly allocated. A similar adjustment shall be made to the end-of-year value of assets for the prior year for purposes of determining the beginning-of-year value of assets for the current year. These adjustments shall be made prior to averaging beginning-of-year and end-of-year values pursuant to § 1.861-9T(g)(2). In apportioning interest expense under the modified gross income method, gross income shall be reduced by the amount of income to which interest expense is directly allocated under this section.

    (e) Treatment of certain related group indebtedness. For further guidance, see § 1.861-10(e).

    (f) Effective/applicability date. (1) In general, the rules of this section apply for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986.

    (2) Paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) (providing an operating costs test for purposes of the nonrecourse indebtedness exception) and (b)(6) (concerning excess collaterization of nonrecourse borrowings) of this section are applicable for taxable years commencing after December 31, 1988.

    (3) Paragraph (e) (concerning the treatment of related controlled foreign corporation indebtedness) of this section is applicable for taxable years commencing after December 31, 1987. For rules for taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987, and for later years to the extent permitted by § 1.861-13T, see § 1.861-8 (revised as of April 1, 1986).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10T(a)In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    In general. This section applies to all taxpayers and provides three exceptions to the rules of § 1.861-9T that require the allocation and apportionment of interest expense on the basis of all assets of all members of the affiliated group. Paragraph (b) of this section describes the direct allocation of interest expense to the income generated by certain assets that are subject to qualified nonrecourse indebtedness. Paragraph (c) of this section describes the direct allocation of interest expense to income generated by certain assets that are acquired in integrated financial transaction. Paragraph (d) of this section provides special rules that are applicable to all transactions described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. Paragraph (e) of this section requires the direct allocation of third party interest of an affiliated group to such group's investment in related controlled foreign corporations in cases involving excess related person indebtedness (as defined therein). See also § 1.861-9T(b)(5), which requires direct allocation of amortizable bond premium.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10T(b)Qualified nonrecourse indebtedness—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Qualified nonrecourse indebtedness—(1) In general. In the case of qualified nonrecourse indebtedness (as defined in paragraph (b)(2) of this section), the deduction for interest shall be considered directly allocable solely to the gross income which the property acquired, constructed, or improved with the proceeds of the indebtedness generates, has generated, or could reasonably be expected to generate.

    (2) Qualified nonrecourse indebtedness defined. The term “qualified nonrecourse indebtedness” means any borrowing that is not excluded by paragraph (b)(4) of this section if:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10T(c)Direct allocations in the case of certain integrated financial transactions—(1) General rule. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Direct allocations in the case of certain integrated financial transactions—(1) General rule. Interest expense incurred on funds borrowed in connection with an integrated financial transaction (as defined in paragraph (c)(2) of this section) shall be directly allocated to the income generated by the investment funded with the borrowed amounts.

    (2) Definition. The term “integrated financial transaction” refers to any transaction in which—

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10T(d)Special rules. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Special rules. In applying paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the following special rules shall apply.

    (1) Related person transactions. The rules of this section shall not apply to the extent that any transaction—

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10T(e)Treatment of certain related group indebtedness. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Treatment of certain related group indebtedness. For further guidance, see § 1.861-10(e).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10T(f)Effective/applicability date. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Effective/applicability date. (1) In general, the rules of this section apply for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986.

    (2) Paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) (providing an operating costs test for purposes of the nonrecourse indebtedness exception) and (b)(6) (concerning excess collaterization of nonrecourse borrowings) of this section are applicable for taxable years commencing after December 31, 1988.

    (3) Paragraph (e) (concerning the treatment of related controlled foreign corporation indebtedness) of this section is applicable for taxable years commencing after December 31, 1987. For rules for taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987, and for later years to the extent permitted by § 1.861-13T, see § 1.861-8 (revised as of April 1, 1986).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10T(i)Involves either indebtedness between related persons (as defined in section § 1. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Involves either indebtedness between related persons (as defined in section § 1.861-8T(c)(2)) or indebtedness incurred from unrelated persons for the purpose of purchasing property from a related person; or

    (ii) Involves the purchase of property that is leased to a related person (as defined in § 1.861-8T(c)(2)) in a transaction described in paragraph (b) of this section. If a taxpayer purchases property and leases such property in whole or in part to a related person, a portion of the interest incurred in connection with such an acquisition, based on the ratio that the value of the property leased to the related person bears to the total value of the property, shall not qualify for direct allocation under this section.

    (2) Consideration of assets or income to which interest is directly allocated in apportioning other interest expense. In apportioning interest expense under § 1.861-9T, the year-end value of any asset to which interest expense is directly allocated under this section during the current taxable year shall be reduced to the extent provided in § 1.861-9T(g)(2)(iii) to reflect the portion of the principal amount of the indebtedness outstanding at year-end relating to the interest which is directly allocated. A similar adjustment shall be made to the end-of-year value of assets for the prior year for purposes of determining the beginning-of-year value of assets for the current year. These adjustments shall be made prior to averaging beginning-of-year and end-of-year values pursuant to § 1.861-9T(g)(2). In apportioning interest expense under the modified gross income method, gross income shall be reduced by the amount of income to which interest expense is directly allocated under this section.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-10T(v)§1.861-10T(v) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The investment does not relate in any way to the operation of, and is not made in the normal course of, the trade or business of the taxpayer or any related person, including the financing of the sale of goods or the performance of services by the taxpayer or any related person, or the compensation of the taxpayer's employees (including any contribution or loan to an employee stock ownership plan (as defined in section 4975(e)(7)) or other plan that is qualified under section 401(a)); and

    (vi) The borrower does not constitute a financial services entity (as defined in section 904 and the regulations thereunder).

    (3) Rollovers. In the event that a taxpayer sells of otherwise liquidates an investment described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the interest expense incurred on the borrowing shall, subsequent to that liquidation, no longer qualify for direct allocation under this paragraph (c).

    (4) Examples. The principles of this paragraph (c) may be demonstrated by the following examples.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-11Special rules for allocating and apportioning interest expense of an affiliated group of corporations Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) In general. For further guidance, see § 1.861-11T(a).

    (b) Scope of application—(1) Application of section 864(e)(1) and (5) (concerning the definition and treatment of affiliated groups). Section 864(e)(1) and (5) and the portions of this section implementing section 864(e)(1) and (5) apply to the computation of foreign source taxable income for purposes of section 904 (relating to various limitations on the foreign tax credit). Section 864(e)(1) and (5) and the portions of this section implementing section 864(e)(1) and (5) also apply in connection with section 907 to determine reductions in the amount allowed as a foreign tax credit under section 901. Section 864(e)(1) and (5) and the portions of this section implementing section 864(e)(1) and (5) also apply to the computation of the combined taxable income of the related supplier and a foreign sales corporation (FSC) (under sections 921 through 927) as well as the combined taxable income of the related supplier and a domestic international sales corporation (DISC) (under sections 991 through 997).

    (2) Nonapplication of section 864(e)(1) and (5) (concerning the definition and treatment of affiliated groups). For further guidance, see § 1.861-11T(b)(2).

    (c) General rule for affiliated corporations. For further guidance, see § 1.861-11T(c).

    (d) Definition of affiliated group—(1) General rule. For purposes of this section, in general, the term affiliated group has the same meaning as is given that term by section 1504. Section 1504(a) defines an affiliated group as one or more chains of includible corporations connected through 80-percent stock ownership with a common parent corporation which is an includible corporation (as defined in section 1504(b)). In the case of a corporation that either becomes or ceases to be a member of the group during the course of the corporation's taxable year, only the interest expense incurred by the group member during the period of membership shall be allocated and apportioned as if all members of the group were a single corporation. In this regard, assets held during the period of membership shall be taken into account. Other interest expense incurred by the group member during its taxable year but not during the period of membership shall be allocated and apportioned without regard to the other members of the group.

    (2) [Reserved]

    (d)(3)-(6)(i) [Reserved]. For further guidance see § 1.861-11T(d)(3) through (6)(i).

    (ii) Any foreign corporation if more than 50 percent of the gross income of such foreign corporation for the taxable year is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States and at least 80 percent of either the vote or value of all outstanding stock of such foreign corporation is owned directly or indirectly by members of the affiliated group (determined with regard to this sentence). This paragraph (d)(6)(ii) applies to taxable years beginning on or after July 16, 2014. See 26 CFR 1.861-11T(d)(6)(ii) (revised as of April 1, 2014) for rules applicable to taxable years beginning after August 10, 2010, and before July 16, 2014. See 26 CFR 1.861-11T(d)(6)(ii) (revised as of April 1, 2010) for rules applicable to taxable years beginning on or before August 10, 2010.

    (7) Special rules for the application of § 1.861-11T(d)(6). The attribution rules of section 1563(e) and the regulations under that section shall apply in determining indirect ownership under § 1.861-11T(d)(6). The Commissioner shall have the authority to disregard trusts, partnerships, and pass-through entities that break affiliated status. Corporations described in § 1.861-11T(d)(6) shall be considered to constitute members of an affiliated group that does not file a consolidated return and shall therefore be subject to the limitations imposed under § 1.861-11T(g). The affiliated group filing a consolidated return shall be considered to constitute a single corporation for purposes of applying the rules of § 1.861-11T(g). For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1989, § 1.861-11T(d)(6)(i) shall not apply in determining foreign source alternative minimum taxable income within each separate category and the alternative minimum tax foreign tax credit pursuant to section 59(a) to the extent that such application would result in the inclusion of a section 936 corporation within the affiliated group. This paragraph (d)(7) applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986.

    (e)-(g) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.861-11T(e) through (g).

    (h) Applicability dates. This section applies to taxable years that both begin after December 31, 2017, and end on or after December 4, 2018.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-11(a)In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    In general. For further guidance, see § 1.861-11T(a).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.861-11(b)Scope of application—(1) Application of section 864(e)(1) and (5) (concerning the definition and treatment of affiliated groups). Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Scope of application—(1) Application of section 864(e)(1) and (5) (concerning the definition and treatment of affiliated groups). Section 864(e)(1) and (5) and the portions of this section implementing section 864(e)(1) and (5) apply to the computation of foreign source taxable income for purposes of section 904 (relating to various limitations on the foreign tax credit). Section 864(e)(1) and (5) and the portions of this section implementing section 864(e)(1) and (5) also apply in connection with section 907 to determine reductions in the amount allowed as a foreign tax credit under section 901. Section 864(e)(1) and (5) and the portions of this section implementing section 864(e)(1) and (5) also apply to the computation of the combined taxable income of the related supplier and a foreign sales corporation (FSC) (under sections 921 through 927) as well as the combined taxable income of the related supplier and a domestic international sales corporation (DISC) (under sections 991 through 997).

    (2) Nonapplication of section 864(e)(1) and (5) (concerning the definition and treatment of affiliated groups). For further guidance, see § 1.861-11T(b)(2).

90 Citing Cases

“A taxpayer generally must allocate and apportion [expenses] using the rules of the section 861 method.” Treas.

AptarGroup Inc., Petitioner 158 T.C. No. 4 · 2022

The sourcing rules are in the regulations under section 861, which are used in conjunction with operative sections of the Code, i.e., Code sections such as section 904 that require the taxpayer to determine taxable income from specific sources or activities.

Section 861(a)(8) provides that “[a]ny social security benefit (as defined in section 86(d))” shall be treated as income from sources within the United States.

Section 861 sets forth general rules for the sourcing ofincome. Subject to exceptions not relevant here, U.S.-source income includes "[c]ompensation for labor or personal services performed in the United States" and income from rent- ing or leasing "property located in the United States." Sec. 861(a)(3) and (4). Under the time charter, petitioner p

His second argument was based on section 861, which specifies sourcing rules for income received by nonresident alien individuals and foreign corporations.

The parties agree that petitioner's unemployment compensation, by analogy to other items ofincome specified in section 861, was U.S.-source income.

2002-18, 2002 WL 71029, at * 2 (taxpayer's argument that he had no gross income pursuant to section 861 from sources within the United States and without the United States was completely lacking in merit), M, 54 F.

During the course ofthe proceedings commenced by the OPR, petitioner admitted that he had advised taxpayers that they were not liable for income taxes for reasons including that the Sixteenth Amendment was not legally ratified and _ 4 _ [*4] that section 861 and related regulations defined "source ofincome" in a way to exclude domestic income ofU.S.

at 295-296 (holding taxpayer liable for a section 6673 penalty because taxpayerfrivolously argued that under section 861 income for services from within the United States was not taxable); Precourt v.

=Buckardt also argued that section 861 exempted the payments he received from taxation .

Sakkis v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2010-256 · 2010

The gist of the section 861 argument is that only foreign-source income is taxable and therefore a taxpayer's domestically earned money isn't.

possible analysis of guarantees . .* * * 1995 WL 1918236 (IRS FSA May 1,-1995) . All. we can conclude from this detour through transfer- pricing law is that it will not help us reach a reasonable conclusion on whether guaranties are services under section 861 . So we'll fall back on the dictionary,. The common meaning,of "labor-or personal services" implies the continuous. use of human capital, "as opposed to the salable product of the person's, skill."'-6 Under this definition, we find that Co

Container Corp. v. Commissioner 134 T.C. 122 · 2010

any possible analysis of guarantees. * * * [1995 WL 1918236 (IRS FSA May 1, 1995).] All we can conclude from this detour through transfer-pricing law is that it will not help us reach a reasonable conclusion on whether guaranties are services under section 861. So we’ll fall back on the dictionary. The common meaning of “labor or personal services” implies the continuous use of human capital, “as opposed to the salable product of the person’s skill.” Under this definition, we find that Containe

Otis E. & Judy Robertson, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2009-91 · 2009

Mayer from preparing any tax forms that he knew would result in understatements of'tax, preparing false or fraudulent returns, and selling fraudulent tax schemes, specifically identifying returns that asserted a section 861 argument (which relates to U .S .

Jung v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2009-34 · 2009

Mayer explained to petitioner the "section 861 theory" that was the basis for Mayer's tax avoidance advice (namely, that most income derived from sources within the United States by a resident U .S .

Rodriguez v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2009-92 · 2009

He claims : "I looked at section 861 and the definition in the Internal Revenue Code specifically states that sources of income are from foreign entities, corporations .-" Apparently, petitioner is relying on the discredited tax-protester argument that the regulations under section 861 establish that a citizen's income in the form of remuneration for services and bank inte

Discussion Section 861 Petitioner’s first and, apparently, primary argument concerns his “confusion” about the “requirements” of section 861, Income From Sources Within the United States.

ems of gross income from any taxable sources listed by the Secretary". With her Form 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Tax Return, for 1999, petitioner submitted similar letters and made similar statements that she did not earn any income taxable under sec. 861. Petitioner, as managing member of Miroyal and National Land Bank, submitted similar documents with Miroyal's and National Land Bank's Forms 1065 for the 2000 taxable year and National Land Bank's amended Form 1065 for its 1999 taxable year.

Cain v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2006-148 · 2006

Attached to the Form 4852 was Form 8275, Disclosure Statement, in which petitioner claimed that the Office of Personnel Management had "improperly reported" annuities paid to him as gross income because this "remuneration" was not from any of the foreign sources listed in section 861 and the regulations thereunder.

Woods v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2006-38 · 2006

(continued...) - 8 - section 861 argument with somber reasoning and copious citations of precedent, as to do so might suggest that petitioner's arguments possess some degree of colorable merit.³ See Crain v.

Tinnerman v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2006-250 · 2006

Petitioner’s frivolous arguments included, among others, that he derived none of his income from sources outside the United States and therefore his income was not taxable under section 861 and various associated regulations.

OPINION Section 861 requires the inclusion in gross income of up to 85 percent of Social Security benefits received.

Wright v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2005-291 · 2005

2003, reiterating and expanding upon his demands for a face-to-face hearing and extensive documentation. He further tendered various arguments about not having any “Income” in the “Constitutional sense” and not being taxable under the provisions of section 861. Mr. Freitag then sent two followup letters, dated November 19 and 21, 2003, respectively. In the first, Mr. Freitag discussed at length the substance of his review of petitioner’s case. Mr. Freitag again emphasized the need to raise rele

Goodin v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2005-158 · 2005

Please just show me the amount of tax I owe in a way that is consistent with Section 861 of the IRC and the implementing regulation and statute.

Olson v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2004-234 · 2004

861, I.R.C., and regulations thereunder, do not exempt his compensation from tax. Held, further, petitioner is liable for the sec. 6651(a)(1), I.R.C., addition to tax for failure timely to file income tax returns for each of the years in issue. Held, further, petitioner is liable for the sec. 6654, I.R.C., addition to tax for failure to pay es

Gary M. & Frances J. DaShiell, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2004-210 · 2004

[Emphasis supplied.] It is helpful to read carefully the specific language from the regulations under section 861 on which petitioners rely.

Cabirac v. Commissioner 120 T.C. No. 10 · 2003

Taxable Sources of Income for the Year 1997” in which he explained his position. He claimed that the Form W-2 submitted by ECS for 1997 was incorrect because he did not have any gross income from a source listed in the regulations promulgated under section 861. Petitioner submitted a Form 1040A, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for taxable year 1998. Petitioner entered zeros on line 7 for wages and salaries, line 14 for total income, lines 18 and 19 for adjusted gross income, and line 24 for

The Section 6330(b) Hearing On May 3, 2001, the trusts each filed a Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing, for tax years 1996-97 in which they contended that: (1) Section 861 and the regulations thereunder preclude the income at issue in these cases from being taxable, and (2) the regulations upon which respondent relies are invalid because they were not published in the Federal Register; and asked that respondent give them case citations showing that income is taxable.

The Section 6330(b) Hearing On May 3, 2001, the trusts each filed a Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing, for tax years 1996-97 in which they contended that: (1) Section 861 and the regulations thereunder preclude the income at issue in these cases from being taxable, and (2) the regulations upon which respondent relies are invalid because they were not published in the Federal Register; and asked that respondent give them case citations showing that income is taxable.

The Section 6330(b) Hearing On May 3, 2001, the trusts each filed a Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing, for tax years 1996-97 in which they contended that: (1) Section 861 and the regulations thereunder preclude the income at issue in these cases from being taxable, and (2) the regulations upon which respondent relies are invalid because they were not published in the Federal Register; and asked that respondent give them case citations showing that income is taxable.

Cabirac v. Commissioner 120 T.C. 163 · 2003

Taxable Sources of Income for the Year 1997” in which he explained his position. He claimed that the Form W-2 submitted by ECS for 1997 was incorrect because he did not have any gross income from a source listed in the regulations promulgated under section 861. Petitioner submitted a Form 1040A, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for taxable year 1998. Petitioner entered zeros on line 7 for wages and salaries, line 14 for total income, lines 18 and 19 for adjusted gross income, and line 24 for

Takaba v. Commissioner 119 T.C. No. 18 · 2002

., and whether P’s counsel must pay certain of R’s costs pursuant to sec. 6673(a)(2), I.R.C. P, initially pro se, made frivolous arguments, which were continued by P’s counsel, who further advocated the frivolous argument that the regulations under sec. 861, I.R.C., establish that, although P is a U.S. citizen, P’s income in the form of remuneration for services and bank interest received from sources within the United States is not subject to tax. 1. Held: P is liable for a penalty under sec. 6

ir compensation for services, - 4 - unemployment compensation, and interest do not constitute gross income. Petitioners argue: (1) There is no law making petitioners liable for a personal income tax; (2) petitioners have no gross income pursuant to section 861 et seq. concerning gross income from sources within the United States and without the United States; and (3) the notice of deficiency with respect to petitioners’ 1998 return is invalid because petitioners allegedly were denied an administ

Rayner v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-30 · 2002

- 4 - In his trial memorandum, petitioner alleged: (1) Income from sources not listed in section 861 is exempt from taxation; (2) income earned by U.S.

Takaba v. Commissioner 119 T.C. 285 · 2002

Sulla filed a status report with the Court advising the Court of petitioner’s “newly-revealed” interpretation of the Internal Revenue Code and supporting regulations; i.e., that, under regulations interpreting section 861, “remuneration for services earned in the United States by a United States citizen from a United States employer was not an operative source of gross income under IRS [IRC] Section 61, and hence exempt income.” Notwithstanding such new interpretation (hereafter, sometimes, the

Sunoco, Inc. v. Commissioner 118 T.C. 181 · 2002

Petitioner argues that, under the version of the section 861 regulations in effect during the years in issue, it “may allocate and apportion net interest, rather than gross, interest expense” in calculating taxable income from sources without the United States for purposes of section 904(a).

Furniss v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2001-137 · 2001

Petitioner contends that income is defined only by section 911 and the regulations under section 861 and that his receipts are excluded from those definitions.

For purposes of calculating CTI, petitioner allocated and apportioned operating expenses pursuant to the "sales factor" allocation method under section 861 and accompanying regulations.

For purposes of calculating CTl, petitioner allocated and apportioned operating expenses pursuant to the “sales factor” allocation method under section 861 and accompanying regulations.

The intended method for allocating expenses in the CTI computations appears consistent throughout the legislative history of the DISC provisions, which states: the combined taxable income from the sale of the export property is to be determined generally in accordance with the principles applicable under section 861 for determining the source (within or without the United States) of the income of a single entity with operations in more than one country.

The intended method for allocating expenses in the CTI computations appears consistent throughout the legislative history of the DISC provisions, which states: the combined taxable income from the sale of the export property is to be determined generally in accordance with the principles applicable under section 861 for determining the source (within or without the United States) of the income of a single entity with operations in more than one country.

I's component concentrate. Respondent argues further that the factual relationship test found in section 1.861-8(b) and (c), Income Tax Regs., is adopted in section 936(h)(5)(C)(ii)(II) through its overall incorporation of the standards contained in section 861. Respondent claims that Q&A-12 must be read in the context of the statute and is to be applied only as a supplement to Q&A-1, which determines, according to respondent, the expenses allocable and apportionable to the possession product in

Medieval Show, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-455 · 1996

Guarantee Fees Paid to Dapy and Roundabout in Connection With the Commercial Paper Transactions Petitioners argue that the guarantee fees were not specifically sourced under section 861 or 862 and urge the Court to characterize the payments as for services or to adopt an insurance premium analogy.

Inverworld, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-301 · 1996

An item may be classified as income from sources within the United States pursuant to section 861, as income from sources without the United States pursuant to section 862, or as income partly from within and partly from without the United States pursuant to section 863(b).

Inverworld Ltd., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-301 · 1996

An item may be classified as income from sources within the United States pursuant to section 861, as income from sources without the United States pursuant to section 862, or as income partly from within and partly from without the United States pursuant to section 863(b).

Medieval Attractions N.V., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-455 · 1996

Guarantee Fees Paid to Dapy and Roundabout in Connection With the Commercial Paper Transactions Petitioners argue that the guarantee fees were not specifically sourced under section 861 or 862 and urge the Court to characterize the payments as for services or to adopt an insurance premium analogy.

Guarantee Fees Paid to Dapy and Roundabout in Connection With the Commercial Paper Transactions Petitioners argue that the guarantee fees were not specifically sourced under section 861 or 862 and urge the Court to characterize the payments as for services or to adopt an insurance premium analogy.

Medieval Attractions N. V., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-455 · 1996

Guarantee Fees Paid to Dapy and Roundabout in Connection With the Commercial Paper Transactions Petitioners argue that the guarantee fees were not specifically sourced under section 861 or 862 and urge the Court to characterize the payments as for services or to adopt an insurance premium analogy.

Coca-Cola Co. v. Commissioner 106 T.C. 1 · 1996

l’s component concentrate. Respondent argues further that the factual relationship test found in section 1.861-8(b) and (c), Income Tax Regs., is adopted in section 936(h)(5)(C)(ii)(II) through its overall incorporation of the standards contained in section 861. Respondent claims that Q&A-12 must be read in the context of the statute and is to be applied only as a supplement to Q&A-l, which determines, according to respondent, the expenses allocable and apportionable to the possession product in

Chevron Corp. v. Commissioner 104 T.C. 719 · 1995

Determination of Source of Income Section 1.861-8, Income Tax Regs., contains an interpretation of section 861, but it is part of the scheme also incorporating sections 862 through 864 and 901 through 908 by which foreign tax credits are computed.

Intel Corp. v. Commissioner 100 T.C. 616 · 1993

* shall be treated as derived partly from sources within and partly from sources without the United States. The statutory structure for determining source uses section 863 to source all items of income, expense, loss, or deduction not enumerated in section 861 or 862. Thus, section 863 is the catchall or “residual” source determination section. The first sentence of section 863(a) requires that all such nonenumerated items “shall be allocated or apportioned to sources within or without the Unit

Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Commissioner 103 T.C. 464 · 1994
Estate of Kurz v. Commissioner 101 T.C. 44 · 1993
Bowater Inc. v. Commissioner 101 T.C. 207 · 1993
Hunt v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 1289 · 1988
Shell Oil Co. v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 371 · 1987
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 996 · 1985
Linseman v. Commissioner 82 T.C. 514 · 1984
Stemkowski v. Commissioner 76 T.C. 252 · 1981
Solano v. Commissioner 62 T.C. 562 · 1974
Howkins v. Commissioner 49 T.C. 689 · 1968
Raich v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 604 · 1966
Erdman v. Commissioner 37 T.C. 1119 · 1962
Pulvermann v. Commissioner 30 T.C. 231 · 1958
Estate of Plessen v. Commissioner 25 T.C. 1301 · 1956
Estate of Ackley v. Commissioner 23 T.C. 639 · 1955
Liberty Global v. CIR · Cir.
United States v. Rose 538 F.3d 175 · Cir.
United States v. Marston 517 F.3d 996 · Cir.
United States v. Retic · Cir.
United States v. Bell · Cir.
United States v. Rose · Cir.
United States v. Clifford Marston · Cir.
United States v. Clayton · Cir.
Birdman v. Office of the Governor 677 F.3d 167 · Cir.
United States v. Thurston Paul Bell 414 F.3d 474 · Cir.
Rayner v. Commissioner 70 F. App'x 739 · Cir.
Deyo v. Irs 134 F. App'x 475 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.