§921 — [§§921 to 927. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–519, §2, Nov. 15, 2000, 114 Stat. 2423 ] Section 921, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 985 , provided for exclusion from gross income of exempt foreign trade income.

157 cases·157 cited

Statute text not available for this section.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-1T Temporary regulations providing transition rules for DISCs and FSCs
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-1T(a) Termination of a DISC—(1) At end of 1984.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-1T(b) Establishing and electing status as a FSC, small FSC or interest charge DISC—(1) Ninety-day period.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-1T(c) Export Trade Corporations—(1) Previously taxed income.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-1T(i) §1.921-1T(i)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-2 Foreign Sales Corporation—general rules
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-2(a) Definition of a FSC and the Effect of a FSC Election.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-2(b) Small FSC.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-2(c) Comparison of FSC to DISC.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-2(d) Organization of a FSC.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-2(e) Foreign Trade Income.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-2(f) Investment Income and Carrying Charges.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-2(g) Small Businesses.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-2(i) §1.921-2(i)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.921-2(v) A FSC must maintain within the United States the records required under section 6001.

157 Citing Cases

Martin C. Cooper, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2010-214 · 2010

4Petitioner has asked the Court to "draw a defining line explaining what qualifies as permissive supervisory control under section 921(a) of the Taxpayer's Relief Act of 1997 when determining employment status of a securities broker dealer for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code".

Respondent contends that “Cases arising under * * * [the WHTC provisions] are not applicable to a section 936 issue” (a contention we reject), and urges us to focus on “the contrary holding in another section 921 case, United States Gypsum Company v.

Respondent contends that “Cases arising under * * * [the WHTC provisions] are not applicable to a section 936 issue” (a contention we reject), and urges us to focus on “the contrary holding in another section 921 case, United States Gypsum Company v.

Respondent contends that “Cases arising under * * * [the WHTC provisions] are not applicable to a section 936 issue” (a contention we reject), and urges us to focus on “the contrary holding in another section 921 case, United States Gypsum Co.

Section 925(a) provides in pertinent part: SEC. 925 (a). In General.--In the case of a sale of export property to a FSC by a person described in section 482, the taxable income of such FSC and such person shall be based upon a transfer price which would allow such FSC to derive taxable income attributable to such sale (regardless of th

Section 925(a) provides in pertinent part: SEC. 925 (a). In General. — In the case of a sale of export property to a FSC by a person described in section 482, the taxable income of such FSC and such person shall be based upon a transfer price which would allow such FSC to derive taxable income attributable to such sale (regardless of t

Kates Holding Co. v. Commissioner 79 T.C. 700 · 1982
Kewanee Oil Co. v. Commissioner 62 T.C. 728 · 1974
Donaldson v. Commissioner 51 T.C. 830 · 1969
Apogee Coal Company v. OWCP 113 F.4th 751 · Cir.
American Arms International v. Herbert 563 F.3d 78 · Cir.
United States v. Nahsiem McIntosh 124 F.4th 199 · Cir.
United States v. Peterson 127 F.4th 941 · Cir.
Ken Lick Coal Co. v. OWCP 129 F.4th 370 · Cir.
United States v. Barry Croft, Jr. · Cir.
Kwai Wong v. David Beebe 732 F.3d 1030 · Cir.
United States v. Stephen Simmons 143 F.4th 200 · Cir.
United States v. River Smith · Cir.
United States v. Jaquan Bridges · Cir.
Sarabia v. Noem · Cir.
United States v. Peterson · Cir.
United States v. Morgan · Cir.
Hobet Mining, Incorporated v. DOWCP · Cir.
United States v. Isaac Charles · Cir.
United States v. Hernandez · Cir.
United States v. Christopher Arthur · Cir.
United States v. Peterson · Cir.
United States v. Peterson · Cir.
United States v. Rose 522 F.3d 710 · Cir.
United States v. Crooker 608 F.3d 94 · Cir.
United States v. De La Paz-Rentas 613 F.3d 18 · Cir.
Broughman v. Carver 624 F.3d 670 · Cir.
United States v. Pena-Lora 225 F.3d 17 · Cir.
Aybar-Alejo v. INS · Cir.
United States v. Michaud 243 F.3d 84 · Cir.
Medchem (P.R.), Inc. v. Commissioner 295 F.3d 118 · Cir.
United States v. Beckett 321 F.3d 26 · Cir.
United States v. Nieves-Castano 480 F.3d 597 · Cir.
United States v. Marceau 554 F.3d 24 · Cir.
United States v. Wallace 573 F.3d 82 · Cir.
United States v. Booker 644 F.3d 12 · Cir.
United States v. Rhone 647 F.3d 777 · Cir.
Arkansas Coals, Inc. v. Albert Lawson 739 F.3d 309 · Cir.
Robert Bautista v. Atty Gen USA · Cir.
United States v. Aldo Martinez 756 F.3d 1092 · Cir.
Oppedisano v. Holder · Cir.
West Virginia CWP Fund v. Page Bender, Jr. 782 F.3d 129 · Cir.
United States v. Wardrick · Cir.
United States v. Uzenski · Cir.
United States v. Mills · Cir.
United States v. Wynn · Cir.
United States v. Carter 465 F.3d 658 · Cir.
United States v. Rose · Cir.
United States v. Bowers · Cir.
United States v. Hull · Cir.
United States v. Introcaso · Cir.
United States v. Navarro · Cir.
United States v. Frenklyn Piggie · Cir.
United States v. Mark Backer · Cir.
United States v. Michael John Walker · Cir.
United States v. Drexel L. Dukes, Jr. · Cir.
United States v. Ben Mullins · Cir.
United States v. Golding 332 F.3d 838 · Cir.
United States v. One (1) Palmetto State Armory PA-15 MacHinegun Receiver/Frame 822 F.3d 136 · Cir.
Sig Sauer, Inc. v. Brandon 826 F.3d 598 · Cir.
Jay Isaac Hollis v. Loretta Lynch 827 F.3d 436 · Cir.
United States v. Sheehan · Cir.
United States v. Nunez 852 F.3d 141 · Cir.
Helen Mining Co v. James Elliott, Sr. 859 F.3d 226 · Cir.
United States v. Ellison 866 F.3d 32 · Cir.
Island Fork Construction v. Jimmy Bowling 872 F.3d 754 · Cir.
United States v. Victor Maturino 887 F.3d 716 · Cir.
United States v. Severino-Pacheco 911 F.3d 14 · Cir.
United States v. Musso 914 F.3d 26 · Cir.
United States v. Samir Benamor 937 F.3d 1182 · Cir.
United States v. Vahan Kelerchian 937 F.3d 895 · Cir.
United States v. Vahan Kelerchian · Cir.
United States v. Samir Benamor · Cir.
United States v. Scott 954 F.3d 74 · Cir.
Aposhian v. Barr 958 F.3d 969 · Cir.
United States v. Thomas Kuzma 967 F.3d 959 · Cir.
Lisa Folajtar v. Attorney General USA 980 F.3d 897 · Cir.
Lockworth, Inc. v. OWCP · Cir.
United States v. Eric Woodberry 987 F.3d 1231 · Cir.
United States v. Scott 990 F.3d 94 · Cir.
Aposhian v. Wilkinson 989 F.3d 890 · Cir.
United States v. Shawn Bacon 991 F.3d 835 · Cir.
Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. Merrick B. Garland 992 F.3d 446 · Cir.
Celia Mazzei v. Cir · Cir.
United States v. Jason Schaefer 13 F.4th 875 · Cir.
Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. Merrick B. Garland 19 F.4th 890 · Cir.
Cargill v. Garland 20 F.4th 1004 · Cir.
United States v. Gallardo-Ortiz 666 F.3d 808 · Cir.
United States v. Davis 668 F.3d 576 · Cir.
Mabel Samons v. Nat'l Mines Corp. 25 F.4th 455 · Cir.
B & D CONTRACTING v. Pearley 548 F.3d 338 · Cir.
United States v. Minor 31 F.4th 9 · Cir.
Tidewater Inc. v. United States 565 F.3d 299 · Cir.
Garrett Kajmowicz v. Matthew Whitaker 42 F.4th 138 · Cir.
United States v. Broadnax 601 F.3d 336 · Cir.
United States v. Broadnax 601 F.3d 336 · Cir.
United States v. York 600 F.3d 347 · Cir.
United States v. Krug 20 F. App'x 271 · Cir.
United States v. Swain 26 F. App'x 15 · Cir.
United States v. Pritchett 40 F. App'x 901 · Cir.
United States v. Fridley 43 F. App'x 830 · Cir.
United States v. Luis Manuel Pea-Lora, United States of America v. Jorge Lorenzo-Hernandez, United States of America v. Thomas Lorenzo-P&eacuterez, United States of America v. Lorenzo Pea-Morfe 225 F.3d 17 · Cir.
United States v. Derek Pedragh, Also Known as Derrick Pedraja, Also Known as Derik Pedraja, Also Known as Derek Pedraja 225 F.3d 240 · Cir.
Antonia Trinidad Aybar-Alejo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service 230 F.3d 487 · Cir.
United States v. Peter Kevin Langan 263 F.3d 613 · Cir.
Custom Ship Interiors v. Roberts 300 F.3d 510 · Cir.
United States v. Frenklyn Piggie 316 F.3d 789 · Cir.
United States v. Robert Junior Wardrick 350 F.3d 446 · Cir.
United States v. Mark Backer, United States of America v. Mark Backer 362 F.3d 504 · Cir.
United States v. Clifton Lamount Williams 364 F.3d 556 · Cir.
United States v. Demetrius Wynn 365 F.3d 546 · Cir.
United States v. Christopher Hay 46 F.4th 746 · Cir.
United States v. Michael John Walker 428 F.3d 1165 · Cir.
United States v. Rysheen Bowers 432 F.3d 518 · Cir.
United States v. Drexel Lee Dukes, Jr. 432 F.3d 910 · Cir.
United States v. Thomas Edward Uzenski 434 F.3d 690 · Cir.
United States v. Ernest Roberts 442 F.3d 128 · Cir.
United States v. Ben J. Mullins 446 F.3d 750 · Cir.
United States v. Andre Mills 485 F.3d 219 · Cir.
United States v. Roszkowski 700 F.3d 50 · Cir.
United States v. Broadnax 595 F.3d 565 · Cir.
Oppedisano v. Holder 769 F.3d 147 · Cir.
United States v. Sheehan 838 F.3d 109 · Cir.
Glen Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs 77 F. App'x 878 · Cir.
United States v. Unthank 107 F. App'x 625 · Cir.
United States v. Shelton 364 F. App'x 733 · Cir.
United States v. Shelton 364 F. App'x 733 · Cir.
United States v. Nuñez 852 F.3d 141 · Cir.
Cargill v. Garland 57 F.4th 447 · Cir.
Scott Hardin v. ATF 65 F.4th 895 · Cir.
Bryan Range v. Attorney General United States 69 F.4th 96 · Cir.
United States v. Raquel Rivera 74 F.4th 134 · Cir.
Mock v. Garland 75 F.4th 563 · Cir.
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC v. Bureau of ATF 78 F.4th 1011 · Cir.
United States v. Perez-Greaux 83 F.4th 1 · Cir.
United States v. Colon-De Jesus · Cir.
VanDerStok v. Garland 86 F.4th 179 · Cir.
United States v. Chaires 88 F.4th 172 · Cir.
United States v. Nieves-Diaz 99 F.4th 1 · Cir.
United States v. Morales-Velez 100 F.4th 334 · Cir.
Ken Paxton, Atty Gen v. Dettelbach 105 F.4th 708 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.