§946

7 cases·7 cited

Statute text not available for this section.

7 Citing Cases

946 (2012) requiresjudges ofthe Court ofAppeals for the Armed Forces to meet annually with the Judge Advocates General and two members ofthe public appointed by the Secretary ofDefense to "survey the operation" ofthe militaryjustice system. Edmond, 520 U.S. at 664 n.2. This contrasts with the Tax Court, which "exercisesjudicial power to the ex

Ronald L. & Mattie L. Alverson, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-101 · 1999

868 F.2d 340, 343- 344 (9th Cir. 1989), and cases cited therein. A material breach of contract is one that substantially defeats its purpose so that the injured party is justified in treating the matter as at an end. See 4 Corbin on Contracts, supra sec. 946, at 809. The - 289 - materiality of a breach generally is considered a question of fact to be decided on the basis of all the facts and circumstances. See Smith v. Empire Sanitary Dist., supra, and cases cited therein. In First Interstate Ba

Terry D. & Gloria K. Owens, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-101 · 1999

868 F.2d 340, 343- 344 (9th Cir. 1989), and cases cited therein. A material breach of contract is one that substantially defeats its purpose so that the injured party is justified in treating the matter as at an end. See 4 Corbin on Contracts, supra sec. 946, at 809. The - 289 - materiality of a breach generally is considered a question of fact to be decided on the basis of all the facts and circumstances. See Smith v. Empire Sanitary Dist., supra, and cases cited therein. In First Interstate Ba

Richard B. & Donna G. Rogers, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-101 · 1999

868 F.2d 340, 343- 344 (9th Cir. 1989), and cases cited therein. A material breach of contract is one that substantially defeats its purpose so that the injured party is justified in treating the matter as at an end. See 4 Corbin on Contracts, supra sec. 946, at 809. The - 289 - materiality of a breach generally is considered a question of fact to be decided on the basis of all the facts and circumstances. See Smith v. Empire Sanitary Dist., supra, and cases cited therein. In First Interstate Ba

John L. & Terry E. Huber, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-101 · 1999

868 F.2d 340, 343- 344 (9th Cir. 1989), and cases cited therein. A material breach of contract is one that substantially defeats its purpose so that the injured party is justified in treating the matter as at an end. See 4 Corbin on Contracts, supra sec. 946, at 809. The - 289 - materiality of a breach generally is considered a question of fact to be decided on the basis of all the facts and circumstances. See Smith v. Empire Sanitary Dist., supra, and cases cited therein. In First Interstate Ba

Hoyt W. & Barbara D. Young, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-101 · 1999

868 F.2d 340, 343- 344 (9th Cir. 1989), and cases cited therein. A material breach of contract is one that substantially defeats its purpose so that the injured party is justified in treating the matter as at an end. See 4 Corbin on Contracts, supra sec. 946, at 809. The - 289 - materiality of a breach generally is considered a question of fact to be decided on the basis of all the facts and circumstances. See Smith v. Empire Sanitary Dist., supra, and cases cited therein. In First Interstate Ba

Silva v. Garland 27 F.4th 95 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.