§98

13 cases·1 distinguished·1 overruled·11 cited

Statute text not available for this section.

13 Citing Cases

Exchange gain or loss with respect to a contract described in § 1 .988-2(d)(1) [i .e ., foreign currency forward contracts, futures contracts, and options] shall be determined by subtracting the amount paid (or deemed paid), if any, for or with respect to the contract (including any amount paid upon termination of the contract) from the amount received (or deemed received), if any, for or with respect to the contract (including any amount received upon termination of the contract) . Any .gain or

435 (1992). Section 1253(b)(1) tells us that there's a "franchise" for the purposes ofsection 1253 ifthere is: - 13 - [*13] (cid:16)042an agreement (cid:16)042in which one party receives the right to provide services (cid:16)042within a defined area. See Tele-Commc'ns, 95 T.C. at 509. Ifa transaction satisfies these three requirements, t

435 (1992). Section 1253(b)(1) tells us that there's a "franchise" for the purposes ofsection 1253 ifthere is: - 13 - [*13] (cid:16)042an agreement (cid:16)042in which one party receives the right to provide services (cid:16)042within a defined area. See Tele-Commc'ns, 95 T.C. at 509. Ifa transaction satisfies these three requirements, t

435 (1992). Section 1253(b)(1) tells us that there's a "franchise" for the purposes ofsection 1253 ifthere is: - 13 - [*13] (cid:16)042an agreement (cid:16)042in which one party receives the right to provide services (cid:16)042within a defined area. See Tele-Commc'ns, 95 T.C. at 509. Ifa transaction satisfies these three requirements, t

United States v. Elias · Cir.
Jacklin v. Commissioner 79 T.C. 340 · 1982
Boyter v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 989 · 1980
King v. Commissioner 51 T.C. 851 · 1969
Tantaros v. Fox News Network, LLC 12 F.4th 135 · Cir.
Madison Recycling Associates v. Commissioner 295 F.3d 280 · Cir.
Madison Recycling Associates v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue 295 F.3d 280 · Cir.
United States v. Michael Norwood 49 F.4th 189 · Cir.
United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Eva C. Temple, Appellant-Cross-Appellee 447 F.3d 130 · Cir.